FSA Investigation
In April I informed you of the FSA
investigation which had taken place in
relation to our affairs and the fact
that this had been concluded with the
FSA finding no evidence to warrant the
taking of any further action. Since then
the FSA have asked me to make clear that
its investigation concerned solely
whether the Society was being conducted
as a bona fide co-operative society and
whether its business was being conducted
for the benefit of members. The FSA was
not investigating into the honesty,
integrity or professionalism of the
Society and accordingly did not and does
not make any comment in that regard.
I now look forward to the future of ODRTSL and to working with
members on the development of our
business for the benefit of all members.
I will update you on these developments
as they progress.
Private Hire
Signage
I have
recently had one of my regular meetings
with the PCO to discuss all items in
general that affect our industry. As you
know, I’ve always been very concerned
the authorities might allow exterior
signage on Private Hire vehicles, a
proposal that was defeated last year by
the taxi industry. I have informed you
in the recent past that the authorities
were going to review the situation,
well, that time has now arrived. It
appears the Operators have now reviewed
the situation and many of them wish to
allow advertising on the exterior of
their vehicles. Should this come about
it will be one of the biggest threats to
our industry we have ever experienced!
Consequently, the authorities are going
to issue a first draft of their
consultation document in the very near
future.
What is extremely worrying is that I have been reliably informed
the Mayor’s office is in favour of
exterior signage, as it would "make the
vehicle easily recognisable." But we all
know that signage would then be used by
members of the public to give
authenticity to the vehicle, regardless
of whether it was licensed or not! If
they think the touting situation is bad
in London at the moment – well they
ain’t seen nothing yet if these proposed
changes in legislation comes about!
I’m convinced that the best way to fight these proposals is
within the subject of Public Safety. The
Mayor’s office believes that the public
are more inclined to get into the
correct vehicle if it has signage – that
is nonsense! In reality, what will
happen is that the more unscrupulous
within our society - and I don’t mean
Dial-a-Cab - will put bogus signage on
their vehicles in an attempt to do a bit
of ‘kerb crawling’ to entice the more
unsuspecting and vulnerable members of
the public into their vehicle. Who knows
what then might happen! I believe this
threat is so serious that all
organisations within our industry should
make it their number one priority. The
issue of signage has been tried in other
UK cities and has been an absolute
disaster, Birmingham being one that
comes to mind. Consequently, we will be
collating all information in order to
present it to the authorities when we
respond to their consultation document.
This is going to be a very difficult
battle to win - far more difficult than
last time – and if I were a gambling man
then I’d put the current odds at 70/30
against us winning. The Radio
Circuits together with our lobbyists
will do everything within
|

our power to stop this proposed change
in legislation and I just hope that all
other organisations within this industry
are just as committed. Quite frankly, I
don’t really care who claims the victory
– if there is one - just so long as we
win. It’s at times like these that we
need one organisation to speak on behalf
of our entire industry instead of just
bickering amongst ourselves and scoring
points off each another. After all, the
Private Hire industry only has one
organisation to speak for them. I have
been in the taxi industry and a member
of Dial-a-Cab for over thirty years and
it has always been the same; what is it
about our industry that promotes a
self-destruct scenario?
Call Sign, Barry
Hooper and Me…!
Speaking of bickering, you may remember
a few issues back that I responded to
Barry Hooper regarding his column in
TAXI regarding the welfare of
Dial-a-Cab. My bottom line was to tell
him to keep his nose out of our affairs
and that it was none of his business!
I’ve now been informed that Barry was
quite upset with my reply and I can
understand why – but you started it
Barry and I am not prepared to sit
around and condone an unprovoked attack
on this Society no matter who
perpetrates the onslaught. In the latest
issue of TAXI (of which I am an avid
reader), Barry replies to our Editor
concerning remarks that he made in the
last issue of Call Sign. Barry says he
has written his last words on the
subject and that the matter is now
closed. However, he asks a few questions
to which I am best qualified at DaC to
answer. He rightly states that DaC
operate a fleet proportionate to the
volume of business and asks if that was
a member’s or a Board decision? It was a
Board decision because we are fully
aware that if the size of the fleet
outstrips the volume of work, then you
lose members as quickly as you fit them.
Conversely, if the database of account
customers is too large for the fleet
then you will obviously lose clients.
Barry goes on to ask why we do not adopt
this principle to the whole trade –
well, it’s obviously supply and demand,
but who says that WE don’t? I have
always been in favour of keeping an
equilibrium; it’s just plain common
sense. Because people run a Radio
Circuit, they should not be labelled and
put in a box as a vested interest, after
all there is not one organisation within
our industry that is not a vested
interest – yes, even the LTDA.
They are concerned with recruiting
members and catering for their
interests, that’s fine and noble but
what better way to appeal to an already
licensed driver than by saying there
should not be any more taxi drivers in
London! That way the cake gets bigger
for existing drivers and is a sentiment
that would accepted by almost everyone.
But that is feasible only in the short
term.
Anyway Barry, I know you want to bring this matter to a close, but
I would like to leave you with a passing
thought: You know me well enough to know
that no matter what I say I always |
tackle for the ball
and not the man…
A Tender Process!
You are probably aware that our largest
account was out to tender and I am in a
slightly awkward position because I am
writing this article on Sunday 25th
September because the Editor has to lay
the magazine out tomorrow! Why should
that be a problem? Well, we cannot use
this client’s name in print until we
receive permission and in this
particular instance, we have not as yet
received that permission. I understand
the Editor has constructed an article
for inclusion in this magazine, but at
the moment he cannot use it!
Consequently, I am going to give you as
much information as I can without naming
the client, if however an article does
appear elsewhere in the magazine
actually naming them and giving more
details, then you will understand why –
we must have received permission before
the magazine went to press.
But I am delighted to inform you that we
have officially retained the account as
sole taxi supplier. There are also
three car suppliers, just as there are
currently…
This is one of the largest accounts in London and the competition
to control the account was fierce, not
only from the taxi industry but also
from the PH side. There are two reasons
why we retained this account. One; they
know us and what we’re capable of
producing regarding their Management
Information and service and second, we
can supply them with Concierge. They
were so impressed with our new system,
that they arranged a visit to our
existing client that uses it and were
given a glowing report. I am absolutely
convinced that due to our foresight, not
only will we win more business with our
new software, but it will also enable us
to retain existing business. We will
pilot one department as of 1st November
and if things are satisfactory, the
whole of the client’s business will be
transferred at a later date.
I know the above will come as a disappointment to a small handful,
because they are totally against
progress with DaC living and succeeding
in a commercial environment, but what
they should remember is that we are in
the service industry and must fulfil the
client’s needs. We must adapt and give
them what they require because as the
customer, they will give their business
to whoever fulfils their criteria.
Currently it is DaC – long may it remain
that way!
Dial-a-Cab Fleet Size?Carrying
on nicely from the above, as I have been
predicting in past issues of Call Sign,
our account work is currently very busy
and even will get busier. To that end,
the BoM have had to institute the forty
trips per month rule, however, we are
still experiencing coverage problems.
As a result, we will be increasing the
size of the fleet slightly, probably by
around fifty mobiles. During the
past ten years, we have operated a
vetting procedure whereby we do not
recruit just anyone onto
Dial-a-Cab, we endeavour to attract the
‘best of the best’. But as you can
appreciate, some do slip through the net
and we do not always get it right. So if
any of you have friends or relations you
believe might fulfil our criteria, ask
them to apply.
Brian Rice
Chairman, Dial-a-Cab |