Date:
Thursday Aug 5… Time: 1500hrs…
Place: Home bedroom….
Where
20 minutes earlier I had climbed wearily
into bed, having just returned from
spending a short stay in an emergency
hospital ward with a sudden health
problem. I was just about to drop off to
sleep when my mobile rang. Had I first
checked who it was, I would have quickly
switched it off and let it remain so,
but not being quite with it I hit the
answer button and was greeted with the
voice of the last person in the world I
wanted to hear - editor Alan Fisher.
"Hello
Mr T How are you?" He had
no idea I was poorly and this was his
usual greeting immediately prior to the
veiled threat of an article for the next
issue of Call Sign… or else!
Admittedly on this occasion his tone
didn’t have the usual Mafia Don twang
probably because being exceptionally
short on material, he was dreading the
worst - which was precisely what he got
when I told him I was off on holiday the
following day and returning after his
deadline date! Exactly what happened
then I don’t know, but from the
God-awful noise emanating from the end
of the line I had visions of him being
rushed to the very place I had just
left! Which left me feeling a little
guilty but obliged in some respect to
honour what Alan as Editor expects from
Board members. Ed’s note: Was I
really as bad as that? Ah well…!
Being the Chairman…
Which leads me to the role of Board
members and in particular the recent
announcement in Call Sign
on Brian Rice becoming our Society’s
longest serving Chairman, to which I
would like to offer my personal
congratulations. Since joining the
Board, I have served with no fewer than
21 different Board members, 4 Chairmen -
including Brian - and have experienced
pressures at Board-level unlike any in
our history, so I feel qualified in
highlighting exactly how much of an
achievement Brian’s record is and the
gratitude we all owe him for reaching
that milestone. Being a representative
of Dial-a-Cab and undertaking the role
expected of an organisation of our size
is extremely unique to say the least…
Unique
in as much as the desire to play a part
as an officer in making DaC a success is
reliant solely on self motivation. In
what other industry do those responsible
for the success of a company do so
without any financial incentives? After
all, as the saying goes, there is
supposedly no such thing as a free
lunch! It’s a point of fact that
financially it makes not an ounce of
difference to our Chairman or the Board
whether we make a million pounds profit
or lose a million, so why take on the
responsibility, why be subject to
personal abuse from certain subscribers,
why take on the worry, why have
nightmares like those I’ve had whilst
waiting for the result of an impending
tender or the likely loss of a big
client? Why allow the job to become
self-consuming? I can speak for myself,
I can also speak for several Board
members who I’ve worked with closely
and I can speak in part for the
Chairman. Primarily you have be of a
certain character, which includes having
a strong affinity with the Society. From
that grows a compelling desire to see
our Society - a drivers circuit - being
more successful than any of the
competition, a desire to see ideas bear
fruit, a desire to absorb knowledge of
the industry and put management skills
to good practice. Plus of course, a
myriad of other reasons according to
each individual.
One
typical example of the job being
self-consuming: Whenever Brian goes on
Holiday, we all tell him to switch off,
clear his mind of the job and come back
refreshed. Does he hell! Every day and
much to the annoyance of his wife
Brenda, he will ring in for an update on
the figures and other details. It’s
that type of obsession. It’s all the
more remarkable when you consider that
during his time in office he has
suffered a very nasty heart attack, but
for him it’s still a 24-7-365
responsibility. And for what? A round of
applause at the end of his tenure as
given to Aubrey Siteman after a lifetime
of serving the Society? No, because it’s
that type of job…
Unfortunately,
not many subscribers are aware of this
required characteristic when they first
join the Board and are in for a rude
surprise. To some, joining the Board is
an ego trip often lasting no more than
one term when they realise the financial
implications at being taxed PAYE at
source. For others there may be
political reasons. There have also been
those whose intentions were good and who
in my opinion had all the right
qualities, but didn’t consider the
responsibility, financial
return, aggravation and lack of
appreciation with the liability that
goes with being a Board
member.
For
example, few realise that in the event
that our Society was to hit a slump
similar to that in the late 80’s and
continue trading knowing the company was
insolvent, each Board member would be
personally liable and suffer the
consequences. One Board member I served
with resigned the moment he became aware
of that fact.
Please
don’t think the above is anything to
do with this year’s elections. I
simply make the facts known so those of
you ignorant of the responsibility of
whomever |
you
elect to the Board, that it isn’t a
job for the boys. It may have been
years ago, but no longer. It is a
proper job, requiring skills,
commitment, conscientiousness and a
call to duty.
If It’s Worth
Doing…
Talking of
doing a proper job leads me onto a
subject that I’m sure, like me,
drives many of you to despair. In an
age where Political Correctness has
gone mad, barely a day goes past when
there is not a report released turning
common sense on its head. One typical
report I read recently concerned
downgrading standards in the workplace
because to achieve a level of quality
is to pressure people into becoming
perfectionist, a characteristic that
in their expert opinion has no place
in modern society.
A
couple of days after reading that
article, I was travelling to work when
I saw a piece of brick wall handiwork
that made me wonder whether the person
responsible was also the author of
that report. It looked as though they
had just used any bricks lying around
with those bits that actually matched
just counting as a bonus! When I was a
young lad I was repeatedly told that
anything worth doing is worth doing
well. After all, it takes the same
amount of labour and effort. That is a
principle that applies to practically
everything we do in life, from the way
we speak, act, present or apply
ourselves, to the work we do.
I’ve
mentioned on occasions my having once
spent a number of years in the fashion
trade. It was at a time when to
produce quality was often the only way
to guarantee repeat business. Most
young men started off having their
suits made at Burton’s, later
progressing to more upmarket local
tailors and it was equally common for
women of all ages to have clothes made
by the many local dressmakers because
socialising or going out for the
evening meant making the effort to
look really smart. Many a time one of
my sisters would badger me to quickly
make a coat or suit for a coming
Saturday evening dance!
Thinking
of those times brings back happy
memories, the odd embarrassment but
also sadness at what happens when
standards fall. One embarrassment that
comes to mind concerns a young lady I
had arranged to meet on a first date
outside Mornington Crescent tube. I
was waiting by my car that I had to
park across in Camden High St. When
she arrived, she waved and like a
flash git I ran across the main road
and hurdled the railings situated
round the edge of the pavement. And as
I sailed through the air like an
Olympic champion, the jacket pocket of
the brand new suit I was wearing got
caught on the railings and was
completely ripped apart. I’ll never
forget that horrible feeling mixed
with tears and anger made worse by my
dopey date rolling on the floor
wetting herself with laughter!
The
repercussions of falling standards,
decline of the fashion trade and the
eventual demise of my business came
when it became fashionable for women
to wear jeans and with it a sloppy
attitude towards appearance that was
never to be reversed. Cheaper imports
and immigrant manufacturers with cheap
labour churning out inferior quality
not only flooded the market, but also
became an acceptable standard of
dress.
Still
today, watch TV and you’ll see
presenters, celebrities including ex
so-called footballers, unshaven and
dressed like tramps. To say it is
making a fashion statement is frankly
an excuse for sheer laziness or worse
- having no sense how to dress as it
was probably last done by their
mother!
Appearing
scruffy, particularly in front of the
media, in my opinion shows nothing but
contempt. It proves nothing but total
disrespect for the viewer and a
certain arrogance. Needless to say,
with a talent level equal to their
mentality, these people don’t last.
The problem is that those of a similar
ilk then replace them. What concerns
me is the damage to the Taxi industry
when the younger element in our trade
copy these so called icons, make a
habit of being abusive to their
passengers, overcharge, take the
longest route or keep themselves or
their cabs in an unacceptable state.
If that carries on, see how long it
will take for the cab trade to meet
the fate of long gone British
industries that were once renowned for
quality.
Tipping, Ageism
and the Royal Family…
Those of you who read the trade papers
may have seen various articles
recently on the subject of tipping.
Personally, whilst I consider myself
reasonably generous when giving a tip,
as a cab driver I often found
receiving it somewhat demeaning and
also at times embarrassing,
particularly when the passenger spends
ages searching in their purse, bag or
pockets for the loose change. It has
been suggested by certain factions in
the trade that the tip should be
included in the tariff, which I cannot
see as being acceptable because in my
opinion a gratuity is recognition of a
job well done.
There
are 25,000 licensed taxi drivers in
London and it would be naïve to think
there are not some who are a disgrace
to our industry. What right do these
people have to be awarded a gratuity
compared to those who genuinely
deserve it? If a gratuity is
acceptable to the authorities, I feel
it would be better if it was
discretionary with a figure for
example of 10% added to the fare, with
a notice similar to that in many
restaurants that if the passenger
didn’t considered it warranted, then
it could be deducted.
I
believe it would go a long way to
improving standards within the |
trade, as every
driver would be conscious of the
manner in which they were doing their
job.
Another
interesting article in the trade press
concerns ageism. I don’t know how
true the facts are, but it appears
from an article in the July issue of The
Badge that there are more cab
drivers over pensionable age than
there are under the age of 30. The
article goes on to say that whilst it
is not the intention of the LCDC to
offend those of retirement age, there
must come a time when the whole
question of a driver’s age comes
into question. Exactly what the LCDC
has in mind with regards proposing an
age limit on having a Bill to
encourage, it argues, more younger
people into our trade, I don’t know.
However, I found it strange that in
that same issue, their Chairman Alan
Fleming voiced criticism of the
Government’s intention to increase
retirement age and the pittance
pensioners receive at present.
I’ve
always been of the opinion that in the
service industry, standards and
quality are more likely to be produced
by those of mature years than many of
the young. For many people of mature
years, just to be active is the
essence of life. It is a bonus to be
doing something useful and putting to
use years of experience and of course
the income, no matter how small on top
of the pittance of a pension, can be
the difference between being on the
breadline and retaining a sense of
dignity.
Daily
we read of the horrors of the MSSR
virus in NHS hospitals caused once
again by inferior workmanship. I
cannot ever imagine that happening
before this work was subcontracted
out, when cleaners were mainly women
of mature years, those same breed of
women we once saw hoards of early in
the morning going into clean offices.
And when I say clean, I mean to leave
polished and sparkling as if it was
their own home.
Standards
will never be achieved unless there is
a genuine desire to see a job well
done and in many instances it is only
the older generation who remember and
still respect those values.
Unfortunately, many of the young are
in too much of a hurry. They are happy
to cut corners. There is pressure to
succeed and meet huge bills and they
will compromise quality to achieve
that aim. Fortunately for the cab
trade, there is still a fair number of
middle to senior age cab drivers
playing their part in keeping the
trade up to standard synonymous with
the past. I mean no disrespect to many
of the young coming into the cab
trade, but sadly I see examples of it
far too often. Not even a simple thank
you.
So
before certain members of the LCDC and
their ilk start putting ideas into Red
Ken’s mind about adding aged cab
drivers onto the ever-increasing pile
of already-destitute pensioners,
they should remember
that they too will reach that age one
day.
Finally,
many of you would have seen in the
press on TV and of course in the last Call
Sign – incidentally the only
paper that had different photos of the
event to everybody else - the recent
gathering at Clarence House of many
people associated with the Cab Trade
of whom I was one. I personally found
the experience very interesting, if
only to be able to judge at first hand
the image portrayed by the media of
Prince Charles and Camilla
Parker-Bowles. Personally I found them
both very charming, easy to speak to,
with a genuine tone of sincerity in
their answers to questions. When it
came to my turn to be introduced, I
chose to avoid the subject of taxis,
which by that time would have been
coming out of their ears. Instead I
offered my congratulations on the
Duchy of Cornwall organic food
products that he is responsible for
and of which all proceeds go to
charity - a subject they both expanded
on with great zeal. Those of you who
like a good banger with your breakfast
should try them, they are really good.
The
reason I mention the above visit is
because of how often we wrongly
perceive others by what we hear or
read about them, something which can
not only be misleading, but can give a
wrong perspective when a judgement is
deemed necessary.
I
know from myself during the early
years as a Board member, the
perception that many members had of me
changed once they and I had the
opportunity to meet face to face.
It’s so easy to believe others or
what we see in print especially if it
suits the purpose. It is one of the
things that really annoys me when I
see derogatory articles in the press
about the Taxi trade by journalists
who cannot think of anything else to
write about. They will pick up on just
one incident involving a cab driver
and blow it up out of all proportion.
Invariably this prompts the public to
have their two pennies worth by
submitting letters agreeing with the
author and giving examples of similar
grievances. There is little we can do
about this except being forever aware
of the importance of how you leave
every fare at the end of your
journey…
Allen Togwell
DaC Marketing
allent@dialacab.co.uk |