In a recent Dial-a-Cab data terminal poll, an overwhelming 86% of drivers voted against John Prescott’s on-off-on plans to pedestrianise both Trafalgar and Parliament Square. Call Sign investigated drivers’ opinions to find out why there was such a negative reaction to the proposal.
   Most drivers responded with fears for traffic chaos, predicting pedestrianisation will cause grid-lock.
   As Trevor Peacock (C21) pointed out, most cabs probably pass through Trafalgar Square between ten and twenty times a day ferrying passengers to and from all directions of the capital. All these journeys would have to be re-routed, in turn bringing increased fares for passengers wishing to travel across town - if they succeed in finding a cab willing to take that route at all!
   Craig Forrest, (L36), predicts that most radio drivers would be reluctant to accept a job that meant travelling through this area, especially at peak times. "The pedestrianisation would have a dramatic effect on the taxi trade’s ability to function correctly," agreed Darryl Cox (T33), whose fears spread for cabbies and London in general if Mr Prescott’s plans were to ever go ahead.
   Mike Holleyoake (M6), is worried that London’s role as a major business and finance centre in Europe is being over-looked. "A large part of our workload is moving business people around the City. To go ahead with the plans would make this aspect of our work impossible. These business people provide much more of the capital’s wealth than tourism," he said. "Their interests should not be forgotten about."

TRAFALGAR SQUARE
PEDESTRIANISATION - DAC
DRIVERS POLL RESULTS

trafalgarsquare.jpg (25195 bytes)

Another major area of concern is that of the environment. "Surely any plan to cut or reduce a main artery in the traffic flow in London can only lead to more congestion and therefore more pollution due to an increase of stationary traffic, slower engine speeds and more concentrated fumes," T. J. Tyldesley (M35) pointed out. "We should concentrate on moving traffic in and out of Central London as fast as possible, not blocking it off," he continued.
   Interesting points were raised by the minority who agreed with John Prescott’s proposal. Stanley Frankel (K46) contradicted views that traffic flow would be hampered, pointing out that since road closures have been affected across the City of London, traffic has flowed much better. Further, the pedestrianisation of Leicester Square has made no difference to traffic levels.
   Likewise, D. W. Smith (K51) cited the time when Lamb’s Conduit Street was closed. He remembers so much opposition from drivers that there was an official boycott of the northern stations. "What stupidity!" he remarked, "the fuss is now forgotten and everyone treats the closure as normal."
   Also interestingly, a few drivers such as K. Ryall (E03) and Max Arnold (D66) considered the best course of action to be banning all private cars from the centre of London. "The only way to make traffic improvements beneficial to Londoners and tourists alike is for the Government to have the courage to stop private cars coming into the centre of London, especially between the hours of 8am - 6pm," said Mr Ryall.

   As always, if YOU have an opinion that you would like to share with Call sign readers, please send it in.

INSURANCE CLAIMS ?
From Nuala Glavin-Davis - Driver’s Services

The following are actual insurance claim form gaffes that were sent out as an internal E-mail within a leading insurance company .
   " I started to slow down but the traffic ahead was more stationary than I thought."
   " A car drove away at speed catching our client who went up in the air and his head went through the windscreen and then rolled off at the traffic lights a good few feet away. The car then sped off and miraculously our client remained conscious and managed to cross the road."
   " I am not responsible for the accident as I was miles away at the time."
   "I pulled into a lay-by with smoke coming from under the bonnet. I realised the car was on fire so took my dog and smothered it with a blanket."
   Q. Could either driver have done anything to avoid the accident ?
   A. Yes, travelled by Taxi
   "I had one eye on a parked car, another on approaching lorries and another on the woman behind."
   "On the M6 I moved from the centre lane to the fast lane but the other car didn’t give way and I went into him."
   An Insurance Company customer collided with a cow. The questions on the claim form were:
Q. What warning was given by you?
   A. Hooter
   Q. What warning was given by the other party?
   A. MOO
   "I didn’t think the speed limit applied after midnight"
   And finally work this one out. . . . . .
   "No witnesses would admit having seen the mishap until after it happened."

Nuala Glavin-Davis


Click to browse the Dial-A-Cab Web Site

Call Sign Home Page

Page 24

Powered by NetXPosure


Copyright © 1998 Dial-A-Cab Ltd, All rights reserved.

Sells Louis Vuitton Vassili GM Store Louis Vuitton Albatros Toiletry Bag Louis Vuitton Pegase 55 Business Louis Vuitton Neverfull GM Cheap Louis Vuitton Albatros Toiletry Bag Alma PM Sale Buy Louis Vuitton Neo Bailey Aviation Louis Vuitton Cheap Louis Vuitton Bags Cheap Louis Vuitton Bags Louis Vuitton Cabas PM Louis Vuitton Bags on sale Authentic Louis Vuitton Handbag Louis Vuitton Bags on sale Louis Vuitton Olav PM Sale Louis Vuitton Organiser Atoll Outlets Sells Louis Vuitton Artsy GM Cheap Louis Vuitton Ceinture