In a recent
Dial-a-Cab data terminal poll, an overwhelming 86% of drivers voted against John
Prescotts on-off-on plans to pedestrianise both Trafalgar and Parliament Square.
Call Sign investigated drivers opinions to find out why there was such a negative
reaction to the proposal. |
TRAFALGAR SQUARE |
|
Another major area of concern is
that of the environment. "Surely any plan to cut or reduce a main artery in the
traffic flow in London can only lead to more congestion and therefore more pollution due
to an increase of stationary traffic, slower engine speeds and more concentrated
fumes," T. J. Tyldesley (M35) pointed out. "We should concentrate on
moving traffic in and out of Central London as fast as possible, not blocking it
off," he continued. Interesting points were raised by the minority who agreed with John Prescotts proposal. Stanley Frankel (K46) contradicted views that traffic flow would be hampered, pointing out that since road closures have been affected across the City of London, traffic has flowed much better. Further, the pedestrianisation of Leicester Square has made no difference to traffic levels. |
Likewise, D. W.
Smith (K51) cited the time when Lambs Conduit Street was closed. He remembers so
much opposition from drivers that there was an official boycott of the northern stations.
"What stupidity!" he remarked, "the fuss is now forgotten and everyone
treats the closure as normal." Also interestingly, a few drivers such as K. Ryall (E03) and Max Arnold (D66) considered the best course of action to be banning all private cars from the centre of London. "The only way to make traffic improvements beneficial to Londoners and tourists alike is for the Government to have the courage to stop private cars coming into the centre of London, especially between the hours of 8am - 6pm," said Mr Ryall. As always, if YOU have an opinion that you would like to share with Call sign readers, please send it in. |
|
Powered by NetXPosure |
Copyright © 1998 Dial-A-Cab Ltd, All rights reserved.