MAILSHOT

Either write to Call Sign at Dial-a-Cab House or email us at callsignmag@aol.com

Cars on ranks?
Hi Al
I’m was waiting outside McKinsey when a car driver asked me if I could move up so that he could park on the rank. I pointed out as politely as I could that it was a taxi rank and that he should look elsewhere. He then said that he worked at Tiger Tiger and that he parked on the rank every night. He went on to add that anyone could park on the rank after 6.30pm.
   So isn’t it amazing that if we park on a rank out of regulation hours, we soon get a PCN...

Barry Spear (Y16)
Call Sign took a look at the rank signage and there is no mention of any time limits. That means no one can wait there other than Licensed London Taxis …Ed

John Boca
Dear Alan
It was with much sadness that we learnt of the passing on Wednesday 1st December of Adolfo Giovanni Bruno Boca – known on Dial-a-Cab as John Boca (ex-A64). He was the younger brother of the late Alan Boca (ex-B99) and the two of them used to run the cafe opposite our first radio office in Pentonville Road. Born of Italian parents, they decided to do the Knowledge and joined ODRTS (as we were then called) in the early 1960s I believe. The pair were always a credit to the circuit.
   Alan and John were not the only brothers we have had on the circuit in years past. I remember Stuart and Malcomb Webster, whilst we still have my brother Ken - who has been on the circuit since 1965 - and myself (1970). There must have been others as taxi driving does run in families. Ken and I have 2 uncles who drove from before the last war, one is still with us and now in his 90s.
   But for now our thoughts go out to John’s son John, a taxi driver with Radio Taxis and his sister Tina, who is married and living in Australia.
   Rest in peace John, from ALL your friends in the taxi trade.
Martin Freeborn (C67)
There is an article on John and Alan elsewhere in this issue …Ed

E14 and voting
Dear Alan
Some time ago I was talking to another driver on Finsbury Square and he said he had emailed Brian Rice concerning the workings at E14. The things he said sounded very sensible but nothing has come of it. His suggestion was that E14C and E14S should be disbanded, leaving our cabs free to put onto any of the ranks – including hotels – while being on the electronic E14 rank, but not restricted to the two longest as at present. Mr Rice replied that he would put it to Keith Cain. Surely it would have been better to put it to the drivers via their terminals? We all have a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ button.
   On the subject of E14, could somebody please explain why we cannot soon to clear into E14 after 9pm? There was a gripe some time ago about drivers being rude to clients, probably not so, just an attitude for which management take no responsibility. If a driver has been waiting some time for a job and gets a local, he has to wait until the client has cleared the cab before he can book in. This benefits nobody, especially the driver concerned.
   I would have liked to propose that anything directly affecting the owners of the Society be put to them via their terminals. However, according to Rule 29, 25 seconders are needed and can only be proposed once a year. Also in this rule, management are free to do as they please.
   I don’t know if anybody agrees with me, but if you do print this letter Alan, perhaps at the end a simple agree/disagree Call Sign signature to be returned to where we trust you have the best interests of the drivers at heart.

Tony Guerrier (L28)

Interesting letter Tony and because the answer about E14 is fairly lengthy, I’ve asked Allan Evans to answer it elsewhere in this issue. I should also add that I showed it to Brian Rice and he trawled through many, many emails to find the one the other driver says he sent because I know from experience that the Chairman always answers emails from drivers. Consequently, I assume the BoM looked at the situation and decided against any change and the member you spoke to would have been advised of that. But Tony,
surely you don’t believe for a single second that the BoM would implement procedures purely to damage the Society, because if they do then they aren’t making a very good job of it? They have to consider what’s in the interest of the majority of members (and clients), not just in the interest of a small percentage of members. So far as voting is concerned, would you want daymen voting on procedures that affect nightmen and vice versa? That’s why an organisation such as DaC needs a BoM - to initiate procedures that are fair to the majority. However, through Call Sign, every driver can always have their say – something I am very proud of.
   Our terminals have been used for surveys on occasion, but not for anything important. Being ruled by a computer would lead to sheer chaos. After all, i
f the Board decide to go for a nationwide GPRS system with chip and pin in the next generation of terminals – which I personally hope they do - should it be put to drivers first and then DaC would go by the majority decision? I don’t think that method of voting is the way ahead.
   As for the 25 signatures before changing rules and procedures; I don’t remember the Board insisting it had to be passed, it was the Members who voted for it because from memory AGMs were getting bogged down with ridiculous attempts at rule changes. If I remember correctly, at one AGM we had a driver putting forward 11 rule changes and propositions – some of them being just silly. Because of drivers like that, democracy took a small kick in the ‘ruperts’ but if a rule change or proposition is worthy enough, then surely it will get the 25 seconders. Thanks for a great letter Tony and read Allan Evans report for the answer to E14 …Ed
 

Call Sign’s speeding letter
Dear Alan,
Would you have a copy of the letter to send to the court about speeding? I remember it was in the magazine a couple of years ago. Or perhaps you could let me know the issue it was in?

John Mason (B83)
The original article was in the May 2006 issue (can this loophole save your licence). I repeated it in the May 2008 issue (is this speeding loophole still working). Both are available on the Call Sign website (www.dac-callsign.co.uk) by going to the respective years and clicking the small PDF logo at the bottom of the icon. A large number of Dial-a-Cab drivers contacted me to say that the first letter worked, but only around 50% of the second batch of drivers were successful. Now some 30 months later, I’d be amazed if the police hadn’t blocked the loophole, which enabled drivers to avoid the three points by taking a one day classroom refresher course instead. But if anyone tries it successfully, please let us know and we’ll be happy to pass on the news to drivers …Ed

Happy holidays to all religions?
Mr Editor
l was shocked to find in the December Call Sign where you itemise religions and wish them all a happy holiday, that you never mentioned my religion. It’s probably ‘cos like most folks, you’re in the dark force against us. One day in the future, you will see the light and fulfil your inner desire. Jimmy Greaves, David Ginola and Stanley Roth are all members and have now reached the point of gaining their light sabre early next year - but naturally this is a secret. Please don't be prejudiced against us. My temple is the cafe opposite the ‘iron lung’ if you fancy a frock and the ability to whip out your sabre.
   I am sincerely your grandmaster knight Jedi,  three down, four across around the corner. May the force be with you. Your servant and prophet…  

Gary Cox (0046)
I knew Gary’s dad, John, very well. He was a really lovely man so I have to wonder exactly where his son went
 

wrong. Perhaps it has something to do with him buying a Vito!!! …Ed

How to insult quietly!
Dear Alan,
Congratulations on your 150th issue of Call Sign. You have managed to produce a fun magazine and maintain a high standard through the years. However you let yourself down in your latest editorial when you felt obliged to send best wishes to Christians, Sikhs, Jews, Hindus, Jains and Muslims. By ticking all the correct boxes, there was a clear lack of sincerity. But more important, you excluded the rationalist sensible drivers who

could be agnostic, secular, atheist or humanist. Why should followers of the religions you choose to include who believe in man-made fairy tales about supernatural powers be given space compared to Druids, Shamanists, Pagans, crystal wavers, Animists, and Voodoo worshipers?
May I end by wishing you a Happy New Year…
Laurence Kelvin (W88)
Thank you Laurence. I do sometimes get the feeling that whatever I say, I’m going to offend someone! A happy New Year to you and everyone connected to Dial-a-Cab …Ed

150 not out!
Hi Alan,
Congratulations on reaching 150 issues, and yet still looking no older than half that age! As a former editor, publisher, writer and contributor with various publications, including Taxi Globe and many others, I know you do deserve acclaim for maintaining such consistently high standards. By doing so, you have made and kept Call Sign as the best in-house radio taxi publication.
   However, in the December Call Sign, on page 5 the caption should have included David Day, and I cannot see the robust Dave Stock in that picture. On page 16 the car is a Porsche, not an Aston Martin. Only last week I was evaluating - ie "borrowing" - a 4 door Aston Martin Rapid, but as this supercar starts at £180,000 plus options, I doubt it can ever be made to pay its way as an owner-driven or fleet taxi, never mind the cost of insurance, tyres and servicing!
   Keep up your good work for the best London taxi radio circuit, and here's hoping to see you and Call Sign reach 300.

Rodney Lewis (ex-D77)
Thanks Rodney, but 300 issues? I don’t think so! …Ed

Eddie Lambert’s ‘additional info’ idea
Dear Alan
What an excellent article and idea from Eddie Lambert (V37) in the December Call Sign -Competing with the likes of Addison Lee. Like most drivers, I have had the problem of trying to find an address in a one-way street and ended up missing it thereby needing to go round again. As an example, I recently had to pick up a passenger in Earls Court Road and couldn’t see the number. It turned out that it was in Childs Place and had I had access to that extra piece of information as explained in Eddie’s article, life would have been so much easier. So yes, I do hope the Board will consider his suggestion for the next generation of terminals.

Sid Nathan (K88)
No one seems to dislike the idea (including me), so you never know. Keep nagging Sid! …Ed

David Brown
My son Simon is on Radio Taxis but managed to get a copy of Call Sign. After digesting it, he passed it over to me and although I no longer drive a cab due to illness, I never tire of reading about the trade.
   In your December issue on page 28, there was an article about a former Dial-a-Cab driver, David Brown and about his loss of both legs. The article said he would like to get in touch with any old friends he had before moving out to Gorleston-on-Sea. Well he and I shared a taxi in the 1970s, which we rented from Jannards at Fairchild Place. We were also on Mountview for a short time as Mike 25. If you could bring us together I would appreciate it and I enclose my phone number. Thanks for any help…

Howard Buskin
If anyone else wants to get into contact with David Brown, just send me your phone or email details and I’ll pass them along …Ed

PCNs bad for the environment?
Hi Alan
Giving cab drivers a PCN is bad for the environment. Why? Because contrary to public belief, we don’t have a mattress stuffed full of cash we can dip into to pay a £60 fine, we have to go out and earn it. Earning a clear profit of £60 to pay a fine equates to about four hours work - that’s four hours burning precious fuel and four hours of an engine pumping out fumes. So, Mr and Mrs London Borough, if you do care about the environment please be sensible when issuing PCNs. If however, you care more about robbing people then please just carry on!
   Question: How many red bus drivers have received fines for stopping in yellow boxes? I think I know the answer. And I wonder if that bus in the December Call Sign (Anyone seen a number 22 bus) which turned 180 degrees in Brompton Road near Harrods, was fined? I know I would be. After all, it’s a no u-turn zone!
   Oh and please fine me double if I park in a bus lane to pop into a kebab house, once for parking and once for eating such garbage (James £60 kebab - same issue)!
   Rant over – for now!
Terry Catherall (Y90)
Thanks Terry, pleased I could help exorcise your ranting inner desires! …Ed

Cash rides
Dear Alan
I picked up a cash ride this week and when we were near the destination, the passenger asked why there was £4 and £2 extras on the meter when she got in? So I did the usual "sorry we didn’t tell you when you phoned and that the booking fee is part of the fare and that all radio taxis have a run etc. She paid me off and I sent a message to ask why she hadn’t been told about the £2 booking fee? I was told that the Terms & Conditions are automatically on when customers phone and they are given the option of hearing them, but that she must have chosen to skip them, so it is not our fault. Had I known that, I would have been able to ask if she had listened to them and that if not, it would be her fault and not ours.
   So Alan, could you please tell all drivers via Call Sign about the T&C so we can all be prepared for this problem and sort it out quickly.

Martin Freeborn (C67)
I think you have already done it! …Ed

Chips with everything!
Hello Alan
Just got a TX4 with a new chip (Call Sign tests super-chipped TX4 – November 2010). I only had a TX2 to compare it against, but boy what a difference!
   Changing tack, could you please ask Brian Rice if any consideration has ever been given to a ‘black cab’ Concierge - not instead of, but to run alongside the present model? Clients can then choose a car or cab. All taxis to be fully loaded (ie all round aircon, sat-navs for rides outside the met, and for all non-fixed price work, a £25 premium. It would be totally voluntary - their money, their choice…

Stephen Field (F68)
Brian Rice replies: Passengers can actually do that by requesting a Vito, which as you know is fully air conditioned (not sure about your TX4 Stephen). I would also hazard a guess that all Vito drivers have a SatNav, because that's the way they are and that is not meant to be a derogatory remark.
   Anyway Stephen, if I remember correctly ComCab did as you are suggesting with their ‘Club Class’ taxis back in around 1995 - and it was an unmitigated disaster, which ended up costing them many thousands of pounds. I don't believe we should endeavour to emulate that. 

John Griffin: I’m guilty as charged…why did they drop the case?
Steve Norris is right (December Call SignI don’t think John Griffin has won). I would have preferred  the DfT to pursue the case against me for encouraging my drivers to enter the bus lane. The two points worth making are that no individual or group voiced any opposition to the M4 bus lane. The facts were that the bus lane worked well and visitors to London were happy with the reduction in their journey times. Secondly why did closing the bus lane mean that I was no longer to be pursued for breaking the law? If a group of robbers are caught robbing a bank and shortly afterwards the bank closes down, are charges dropped against the robbers? Lets face it, I was guilty, how did I get away with it?

John Griffin
Chairman, Addison Lee
London NW1
Mr Griffin, my belief is unchanged. I think that if your drivers had been stopped from using the M4 lane, then it would have suited you to see it totally disbanded. After all, if you can’t make the Heathrow return trip quicker than normal traffic, I have no doubt that you’d rather we didn’t have the facility either. For the record, I dislike immensely what you did re the M4, but would find it difficult to blame you knowing the amazing weakness of the authorities who were so obviously afraid of standing up to you – hence the dropping of all PCNs and no charges etc. And congratulations to our Chairman Brian who two months ago said in his column that he believed John Griffin wanted his day in court! …Ed

Credit card problems
Dear Alan,
I read with interest Allan Evans article on credit cards in the
December issue of Call Sign and would like to relay to other drivers the realities of what can happen when a job goes "belly-up." In April I accepted a radio despatched credit card job from WC1 to the Marriott Hotel,

Waltham Abbey (E99). The job was completed and a printed
receipt with signature and authorisation code was obtained. Four months later, I was called by DaC’s accounts department to ask for the receipt, which I sent back the same evening thinking what a clever boy I had been for having everything in order! I heard nothing more from DaC until I opened my statement about five weeks later to find that the money(£85) had been snatched back by DaC. I left a message with Driver Services and when they called back I told them what had happened and they said that I should be covered as I had the receipt and authorisation code, but that they would look into it. One week later I again rang Driver Services and again went through the whole process of explaining what had happened. I was now told that the card had been stolen and that was the reason I had the money taken back (even though I had the printed receipt with auth code) but they would check my loggers and get back to me. One week later I rang them again and yes, you guessed it, I had to explain the whole process over again! I was told it was a Tuesday and that problems were sorted out on Wednesdays (if you don’t believe that, please check the phone recordings) and I would be called back. One week later I thought I would try a different approach and call the Driver Operations Manager, but he was off that week so I explained the whole process to the lady who was covering for him and that the loggers were supposed to be checked. She informed me that she would look into it and get back to me. Guess what? Yes, one week later I rang DaC and the Driver Operations Manager was back. I explained the whole sorry saga to him and he said he would look into it and get back to me. One week later I rang him again to see what was happening and only had to briefly explain the problem as he sort of remembered - lucky me! I was then told I should have taken a rubbing of the card, even though I had the printed receipt and was made to feel like it was my fault, although at no time was I asked if I had taken a rubbing of the card before the money was snatched back. But he assured me that he would look into it and contact me. We were now into November, and my head was heavily bruised from bashing it against the brick wall , so I left it at that.
   Happy days? Last week an envelope from DaC dropped through the letterbox! Great I thought, they’ve resolved it and are reimbursing me. Uh-uh, it was a request for the staff Xmas box!                                                                                            
Ian Skeels (J74)
Hi Ian, sounds like you wish you hadn’t taken the job! However, the reason you haven’t been paid is because you broke the number one rule that has been written about in Call Sign so many times by Keith Cain, Allan Evans and Warren Smith. You manually input the number (I assume because the card wouldn’t swipe) and the bank will no longer accept card trips where the number was input manually because according to a Warren Smith article last year, there are too many stolen cards out there. If it doesn’t swipe, then you shouldn’t take the job and according to a BM, the loggers show if it has been swiped or manually input. Perhaps the card is genuinely just worn and that’s why it won’t swipe, but you can’t take the chance – at least not for roaders like that one. If the card had swiped and was stolen, you would have been paid. Sorry Ian, I wish the news was better. And at least you only had to ask me once! …Ed

The Mayor’s emissions policy…
Hi Alan
Just read on my terminal a message from Brian Rice under the heading of Hot off the Press regarding the Mayor’s announcement that as of 2013, no cab aged over 15 years would be passed for use as a taxi but that there would be two MOTs per year. Thanks to the Chairman for getting it out so quick, even Taxi hadn’t hit the stands with the news yet!
   Whilst this news sounds pretty good, as I get older I become more of a cynical old duffer and usually find that there is no such thing as a free lunch and can’t help wondering what the private hire bandits have been offered for Christmas!

Kevin Went (N19)
You’re right Kevin, there’s usually a piece that we don’t like hidden in there somewhere and two MOTs isn’t wonderful news, however these are going to be MOTs and not overhauls – just as PH have been doing for some time. If your 15-year-old cab were to be licensed on 31 December 2011, then it would be ok to drive it until 31 December 2012. Otherwise the ‘no to 15 year olds’ will start from 1 January 2012. There will also be a yearly emissions test that you could be stopped in the street for, but believe me Kevin, the possibility of a 10-year ban was on the cards and that would have killed us. The way I see it is that if London Assembly Green Party member Darren Johnson doesn’t like the plan, then it must be good for us! …Ed

Vito rant?
Dear Al,
I read the whole of last month’s Call Sign and I thought you'd let me down, but there it was on page 34, the anti-Vito rant. Well you're going to love me cos I've got a Vito and a SatNav. Why did I get a Vito? My last cab was a TX2. Nuff said! You said you can't understand why drivers use SatNavs, well maybe it's because we have a map facility that is 12 years out of date and shows the O2 arena as Millennium Experience (under construction), the Jubilee Line extension is apparently due for completion in 1998 - all being well! The A102 extension is due to be finished in late 99. By the way that's the road Swampy was protesting about -remember him? He’s probably telling his kids about his 15 minutes of fame now. The Croydon Tramlink will be finished in 2000 as long as we survive the Millennium Bug, even the Arsenal are still at Highbury!
   Al, I can remember you writing a piece telling us how great the new terminal was going to be, I bet you didn't think we'd still be using it 13 or 14 years later. Maybe you could do another article asking the board why we still have a screen that you can't read when the sun shines or why the supposedly bankrupt Radio Taxis are getting their second new terminals while we’re sitting with £5 or £6 million in the bank and have now got the worst system in the trade. At the same time, could you ask why after years of telling us that we are causing the poor signals due to doing queue positions and sending messages, the signals are as bad as ever? On second thoughts don't bother; can we have another story about a parking ticket and a picture of a member of the board?
C.S Clark (F25)
Congratulations on writing the longest letter I have ever received via an iPhone! You sound as though you enjoyed it and yes, you succeeded in making me smile! But sadly, your letter has done nothing to convince me that a vehicle which looks like a minicab complete with SatNav, does this trade any sort of favour. But hey, it’s a free world and anyone can buy a Vito if they want to – including minicab drivers. Of course those same drivers can’t buy a TX4 to use as a taxi as it’s illegal, some silly rule about minicab drivers not being allowed to drive a real taxi.
   You might be right about me and the terminal, but only because computers lasting this long are practically unheard of and a testament to the excellent quality of the original product. The map is truly out of date, but that wasn’t DaC’s fault, it was due to Geographers who pulled the plug. But I suspect that you are pretending when you infer you need it to find the O2. Or should they spend another few million quid getting new terminals just to get another map facility? Isn’t that why you did the KoL? I carry a SatNav just in case and have used it 4 times in three years. On those 4 occasions I stuck it to the windscreen, otherwise it stays in my bag because I consider it to be humiliating when passengers give me a postcode rather than an address. And in any case I’d bet that by the end of 2011, we have new terminals that blow away anyone else’s. Anyway, it’s all irrelevant now. Once we all drive the same vehicles with the latest SatNavs, the trade that many of us fought tooth and nail for will be a distant dream and all you will need to become a taxi driver is a licence that you can just send off for.
   Are the signals still bad? I work five nights a week and have had no trouble for ages and for your information, stories in Call Sign about parking tickets given to drivers have led to a successful High Court case which will assist radio drivers in their PCN battles. That story is in this issue.
   Pictures of Board members? Mike Son and Brian Rice led the field in the issue you refer to with two each! Sorry that was too much for you, but it was Mike’s 45th anniversary!
   I assume we both feel better now! …Ed

Answers to the Call Sign Quiz

1. 14 persons
2.
Because they are not proper houses, just five-storey frontages with dummy windows and doors. It is supported by girders over the metropolitan railway.
3.
Her name was Amelia Lewis, living to over 80 years of age in Adys Road, Peckham.
4.
They bow to the altar, which used to be in St Stephens Chapel, not to the Speaker.
5.
The monument was intended by Christopher Wren to be a vast vertical Telescope. The height (202 feet) being insufficient for the focal length and the idea was abandoned.
6.
The first movie was taken at Hyde Park Corner, by William Friese-Greene in 1899.
7.
1870.
8.
London’s first pillar box was erected opposite 101 Fleet Street, EC4 in 1854.
9.
St Martin’s in the Fields; gas first used in 1808, electric light first used in 1888.
10.
The Churchyard at St Mary’s Lambeth.
11.
Pall Mall.
12.
London Bridge
13.
Largest, Regent’s Park, 450 acres: smallest Hampstead Heath, 250 acres.
14.
Grosvenor Gardens opposite Victoria Station.
15.
After the Greek word for brothers as it was built by the Adams Brothers.

16. The world famous clown Joseph Grimaldi.
17.
Marble Arch.
18.
On the South East corner of Trafalgar Square.
19.
St Peter’s ad Vincular on Tower Green. There are buried the victims who were beheaded on the nearby executioners block Tower Hill.
20.
It was first employed by the London School Board election of 1870. The Ballot Act for Parliamentary elections was passed in 1872.
21.
Victoria Embankment.
22.
He is in the group erected in memory of Quentin Hogg in Portland Place.
23.
It was moved to Embankment Gardens while Piccadilly Underground was being built.
24.
In the mosaic on the floor of the entrance hall of the National Gallery.
25.
Acton.
26.
It took its name from the palace where Scottish Kings used to lodge when visiting London.
27.
It was a handbell, now in St Sepulchre’s Church, Holborn Viaduct. A Robert Dowe left a sum of money to buy the bell, which was rung outside the condemned cell at Newgate Prison on the night before an execution.
28.
Geoffrey Chaucer.
29.
Beechwood Road off Dalston Lane E8.
30.
St Anne’s Church, Dean Street, Soho

logthumb.gif (1312 bytes)

January 2011 Call Sign Home Page

Powered by NetXPosure


Copyright 1997-2011 Dial-A-Cab Ltd, All rights reserved.