MAILSHOT
Either write to Call Sign at Dial-a-Cab House or email us at callsignmag@aol.com

Southampton Row U-turn success
Hi Alan
  
Just received a letter from Camden Council informing me that they are refunding me my £60 for making a u-turn in Southampton Row. They admitted the signage was not visible from Vernon Place. Many thanks to everyone that wrote in Call Sign with advice.

Stephen Brady (Nova 31)Pleased to hear that Stephen.
   Last month’s Call Sign had a similar letter from Gerry Tobin (L32) who had his U-turn ticket overruled after taking our advice of keeping on at the council. No doubt many others have now realised that an incorrect signage means that you cannot "fine" drivers. If you give in, they won’t offer you a penny. They are taking your hard-earned money. At least make sure they are in the right before you give it to them …Ed

Cash bookings?
Because of the severe economic downturn it looks as though it could be a long, hard winter on the streets, so I wonder whether the Board might consider bringing back pre-bookings for cash work. Yes, the odd one might blow out, but the vast majority are usually ok. Perhaps more to the point, can we afford to let any possible work go? Allen Togwell always used to say that you could never tell what might lead to someone opening an account; perhaps a return to allowing cash pre-bookings might help?

Antony Hizer (E63)
   I asked the Board and I believe that cash bookings are already back. Drivers can assist in the publicity by picking up two additional door stickers with the DaC cash phone number on. These fit below the CCC logos …Ed

Dear Alan
I have seen on the screen of my MDT that there is a TX2 for rent with "full back up." I have a TX4, I have searched it from front to back, top to bottom, but I can't find a back up on it. Are they unique to TX2s? What is a back up? How much does a back up hold? Will a cab work with an empty back up? These are important questions to which I need answers; can anybody help…?  
Alfred Cook (A62)
   Are you trying to pull my plonker, Alf? You wouldn’t like me if you got my back up …Ed

Dial-a PCN???
I have just read the Peter Hopkins (W60) article in December’s Call Sign re the PCN he received whilst mopping up his spilt hot drink and cannot tell you how angry this has made me. Not because once again the Evil Empire has successfully extorted money from an honest taxi driver trying to make an honest living, but because it seems that Mr Hopkins just rolled over and accepted his fate. Where is the fire in your belly, Peter? You've found the time to meet Call Sign but couldn't be bothered to write an Appeal! Once again Westminster has seen its ongoing persecution of the Taxi trade justified.
   I don’t want to dig Peter out; I just am fed up hearing about our colleagues giving away £60 a time on stupid PCNs and then moaning about it afterwards! Well, boo hoo, let’s begin to do something about it!
   Nuala at Driver Services has in the past contacted me on behalf of drivers and I have happily given advice on how to keep your money in your pocket. That support is available to all! Just call Nuala and she will put you in touch! The only thing I ask is that you do not leave messages. I will not return calls as that could turn out to be very costly! But my phone is always with me and you will get through eventually.
   We are now chest-deep in recession and about to enter a traditionally quiet period for the trade where this year we may genuinely wonder where our next fares will come from. We must not allow the "thieves" at Westminster reduce our takings any further! Fight back!
  
Be lucky, be strong!

Martin Hizer (M47)
Martin has probably won more PCN Appeals than anyone on DaC. As you can see from this issue, Call Sign was invited to Westminster’s CCTV centre where although they treated us immaculately and answered all our questions, it was fairly obvious that our visit wouldn’t change anything. However, soon after and also in this issue, a DaC delegation met Westminster and that has given hope of special treatment. In the meantime, Martin’s offer is genuine …Ed

Fare increase?
Re your Editorial in the December issue of Call Sign. The public are choosing their transport carefully, not purely on price though. Remember, there are lots of travel options, taxis, private hire, buses, trains, tubes, coaches,  riverboats, DLR, cars, bikes and even walking. A once a year rise ain't going to lose us our customer base because, let’s be honest, did we really have one to lose?
   It’s a free market and people only use us when they want to, or when it suits them. The same goes for other forms of transport. Just look at last year; 50-99 uncovered jobs in EC5 regularly, this year 99 waiting cabs! I think that alone proves my point. I'm not sticking up for PH, but it does annoy me when we say that P.H are nicking our work. How can they be? It’s not our work in the first place, we have no right to claim any work out there and the London streets, public and businesses owe us no living. People have the right to choose how they get from A to B. Ask Tom Whitbread how he gets from Dalston to the West End? I bet when it suits him, he gets a 38 bus or if it suits, he gets a cab. Instead of moaning about what others are doing, we as a trade need to promote ourselves more.
   My concern about no 2009 fare increase would be that when the slowdown ends - and it will end - people will be jumping into cabs as if nothing had happened and with no rise there is a danger that we could be driving people around right up to 2010 on 2008 prices. And what happens then? We’d have to have an 8% rise in 2010 to cover 2 years and then people would really moan.

Michael Beevor (N76)
Thanks for an interesting perspective, Michael. Your logic is sound – my problem is that I don’t think logic comes into this scenario as much as it did the last time we faced a similar situation. Yes, there are lots of travel options but I don’t think you are right in believing that cost doesn’t enter the equation. It might not for someone who takes the occasional cab, so yes, your scenario may well apply so far as street work is concerned. But it surely doesn’t apply to a corporate client on radio that spends £3million a year with DaC? Let’s assume it’s a bank that’s trying to keep the City happy with its finances and they hears they can save 20% of their taxi cost by using PH – and yes, 20% has been touted around as a possible saving. That comes to £600,000 a year and hardly chicken feed. Whether those car companies could afford the discount is another matter, they’d still take the work and to say it isn’t ours in the first place is being a bit pedantic.
   I agree that we need to promote ourselves and that was my point in the Editorial. Other than being the best – which everyone knows anyway – we need something else at a time like this and I felt that being the only major form of transport not to take an increase this year could help us. Yes, we’d somehow have to claw it back when the recession ends, but reading your letter, Michael, it’s as though you believe that this time next year we’ll be back to normal? I doubt it, although I hope I’m wrong.
   For some time to come, we are going to struggle to find fares and my belief is that we might just get some extra work if we do not take the increase. If we do and it is the 3.9% that I’ve heard touted around, then for every £100, you’ll get an extra £3.90 – not even the price of one job. Your words were that we as a trade need to promote
ourselves more; for the loss of that £3.90, I think we could

all get a few extra trips a day. Either way it’s gonna be tough …Ed

And again…
Hello Al,
I agree there should not be an increase next year, but I would put forward an increase by stealth. I’m fed up with four or five handers getting into the cab for a short journey and they end up paying less than on public transport! So I’d like to put forward an idea.
   For five passengers, the minimum fare would be £10, four passengers £8, three passengers £6 and two passengers £5. I don’t know how much this would generate, but at least it would be something. I look forward to your view…
Barry Spear (Y16)
   Thanks for that Barry. Your suggestion does make sense, although changing the complete format of the way we charge could involve us in a non-stop round of disputes at a time when we might be happy just to get a fare. Imagine having to tell a group that the £5 on the meter is really £10? So as you asked for my view, I’d say that it’s a good idea for a future time when the recession looks to be on the way out …Ed

LCDC – Terry Bezant responds…
It had not been my intention to speak publicly about the circumstances of me leaving the LCDC, but as my name has now appeared in the December issue of Call Sign I feel I should respond.
In his letter (page 35 December) Darryl Cox says that Alan Fleming and Dave Cohen left because their position had become untenable after they gave evidence on my behalf. This is simply untrue. Mr Cox and his colleague Grant Davis, know very well that Alan Fleming and Dave Cohen both left because of the disgraceful behaviour of this little group of dissidents who were trying to draw the LCDC into a war with DaC in the time running up to and following Grant Davis' expulsion from DaC. They had repeatedly tried to use the LCDC paper, The Badge, to publish anti-DaC material which Alan Fleming, the editor refused to do.
Furthermore, on the question of cost to the LCDC of my failed claim against them, the Judge having denied my application on a technicality refused to award costs against me despite an attempt by the LCDC barrister to get costs. When Mr Davis pathetically began to pontificate to the Judge about his 'duty of care to his members' she said to him: "Why don't you quit while you're ahead" and waved him away. She was clearly not impressed with the behaviour of Grant Davis or his colleagues and wished me well as I left the hearing. My conscience is clear that any costs borne by the LCDC, was because of the behaviour of the committee led by Grant Davis and not me.
Collectively, Dave Cohen, Alan Fleming, myself and others have worked for many years to build the LCDC into a credible and ethical cab trade organisation. Regrettably, if the members don't wake up to what is happening, all of that hard work will have been for nothing.
Terry Bezant (W87)

Taxi Driver of the Year dinner and dance
We would like to thank everyone for their support at our annual dinner dance and making it a great success. For those who missed it, the raffle prize winners were:
1st prize (Trip to New York): Tony Warren from the East London Cabbies
2nd prize (32inch TV): Shirley from Middlesex
3rd prize (Nintendo Wii): Steve Thompson
4th prize (Nintendo DS): Phil Sharp
5th prize (Hamper): Nick Watkinson
6th prize (Overnight stay with breakfast at the Connaught Hotel): John Anderson
   The Chairman, Committee and their wives would like to wish you all a very happy and healthy Christmas and safe and prosperous New Year.
Russell Poluck MBE (T55)
Hon Chairman TDOTY Charity

Yellow badges in London?
Dear Alan
I would like to thank you again for publishing my letter regarding yellow badge drivers. It has become apparent to my husband and I that we are not the only ones who are frustrated by this and would like something done to stop this illegal and unfair practice.
   Having read the article in December's Call Sign by O85, I presume the writer is referring to Radio Taxis. They allow yellow badge drivers to join the circuit and they are offered green badge work. They even offer an incentive of 4 weeks free subs to any yellow badge driver who introduces another yellow badge driver to join the circuit. When I first wrote to you in September, I also wrote to Radio Taxis. Now I can see why they did not publish my letter in their own in-house magazine. Referring back to my original letter to Simon Buggey at the PCO, the first reply I received from him stated that if he were informed of any yellow badge drivers working illegally, he would make sure that appropriate action was taken against the driver. A certain yellow badge driver, who drives a gold spec TX4 registration number ** *** with Radio Taxi logos on his doors, has been seen several times over the past few months working in central London. He was sighted dropping a fare in Lots Road, Chelsea and after being paid, drove off with his for hire sign alight. He was also sighted on two separate evenings waiting for a fare on the Excel taxi rank. I did report these sightings to Simon Buggey, whose reply was that the driver would have to be caught ‘in the act’ before any action could be taken against him. This is going to be very unlikely considering there are several thousand black cabs working in London every night, even though this driver is more easily recognised because he has a personalised number plate.
   I read the article by Brian Rice confirming that the subject of yellow badge drivers had not been discussed at any of the meetings he had attended at the PCO. I am pleased that he will be raising these issues when he next meets with them and I’m looking forward to hearing about this if he decides to write about it in his Call Sign Chairman’s column.
   As for me, I will continue with my campaign until something is done to stop yellow badge drivers working in central London. When the public and the PCO officers on the street are able to distinguish between yellow and green badge drivers, I will be happy to rest my case.
Michelle Haslam (wife of a DaC driver)
Thanks Michelle. Your original letter and its follow-ups has brought a response from the PCO (elsewhere in this issue) not to mention quite a number of phone calls from DaC drivers - mostly similar to the two letters below. My problem is that whilst I do not disbelieve you, it would be unfair for me – not to mention the many RTG drivers who would also be annoyed to find a yellow badge picking up their street work - to publish the RTG driver’s registration number just on your say so. However, I have it in the cab with me and anyone who has any suspicions of a particular driver’s actions during the evening (up till 22.30) is welcome to phone me to see if the reg number matches …Ed

Yellow star?
Like most drivers, I am appalled to read of yellow badge drivers picking up in the central London green badge belt. Perhaps the PCO should introduce a system where a yellow or green star could be put into the front of licensed taxi to signify whether the driver is licensed for that area. I assume that if a yellow badge picks up in town, then he is acting as an unlicensed driver in an unlicensed vehicle? A bit like a minicab perhaps?
Bill Tyzack (C06)
Thanks for the suggestion, Bill. Not sure about the yellow star though as it has connotations from WW2 concentration camps. But see the letter below for a similar idea that sounds as though it could have possibilities …Ed

Yellow licence plates?
I was rather shocked to read the ongoing saga of yellow badge drivers picking up in town, but there does seem to be a logical answer to the problem. When a cab is passed, the PCO / SGS find out whether it is to be driven by a green or yellow badge driver and issue the plate either in the usual white for a green badge or tinted yellow for drivers with that colour badge.
   For those proprietors who rent cabs out to both sections, they can have one of each and should affix it to the cab’s rear after being shown the driver’s badge and bill. After checking that the numbers correspond and the

photo shows the correct person, anyone then deliberately caught deceiving that system would be severely brought to task with a long suspension.
Jimmy Long (V04)
   Jim, I asked Simon Buggey - Senior Driver and Operator Policy Manager at the PCO - to give a view. He told Call Sign:
   We take the issue of suburban taxi drivers working outside of their licensed area very seriously and as PCO Notice 44/08 stated, any driver caught doing so will have his licence suspended for one month for a first offence, with a longer period of suspension or revocation if he offends again. As I am sure Call Sign readers will appreciate, policing this problem is extremely difficult as it is hard to identify or catch such offenders. We are therefore looking at alternative forms of identification that would make it easier for the public, PCO compliance officers and the police alike to know whether the driver is a suburban or All London driver. We propose to carry out a public consultation in the new year that will address the issue of identifiers for PHVs and we will take the opportunity to include the additional issue of taxi drivers' identification. I would encourage drivers to respond to the consultation, as this will be their opportunity to make innovative suggestions such as that from Mr Long…Ed

Those foreigners from Northern Ireland…!
I am an independent producer for the BBC and had a bad experience with one of your cab drivers this afternoon. I had just returned from Belfast after a broadcast event and took a Dial-a-Cab taxi with a client and her toddler from Paddington Station to Tavistock Place.
At the destination, the driver refused to take a Northern Ireland £10 note, claiming that it
was not legal tender as Northern Ireland was not part of the UK. Not only is this incorrect, but it was extremely embarrassing to me in front of my client. The driver was indignant that he would not take the note and I managed to scrape together some English pound coins to pay him. He refused to give me his name or licence number and drove off.
You say that you pride yourself on customer service. I will definitely spread the word amongst my colleagues at the BBC to only use your company as a last resort if this is the kind of treatment I receive – especially with a client. Could you at the very least instruct your fleet that Northern Ireland is part of the UK and that its’ currency is legal tender.
Lou Stein
   Thank you for your letter Mr Stein. I am sorry that you were embarrassed, but to avoid you in turn embarrassing your colleagues, the BBC only use us as a last resort anyway! Your tone reminds me of someone who says they will refuse to watch the BBC again because the wrong person was kicked of in Strictly Come Dancing! I suspect the driver just didn’t want the hassle of having to take it to the bank, as I’m sure you realise Mr Stein, that it isn’t a note many would readily accept. In fact Bank of England notes are the only ones that are legal tender. Scottish and Northern Ireland banknotes are not legal tender anywhere. However, neither are they illlegal and those that wish to accept them are free to do so if they choose. Their banknotes are promissory notes as against legal currency, so they are not actually legal tender in the sense that we usually mean. Those banknotes are a bit like cheques. If both sides are happy with it, then it’s fine and most cab drivers, garages, stores and of course all banks will accept them. But they don’t have to.
   However, your story also reminds me of an incident I faced some time ago at the Hoilday Inn hotel in Kings Cross Road. Having taken my passengers on the short £4.60 ride from Kings Cross Station, they gave a a Scottish £20 note. I accepted it as I usually do (and NI notes too) and proceeded to give them their change – 40p in coins, a £5 note and a Scottish £10 note. They refused to accept the Scottish note saying that it would be too difficult to get rid of! I neglected to ask them if they worked for the BBC!…Ed

Thank you to the 25 proposers....
I would like to thank the 25 plus drivers who signed my proposition to change the Going Home procedure. However I have withdrawn it for this year at least because the current computer system cannot store cumulative number of jobs done.
   The proposition was to make it harder, ie do more jobs before you had the option of using Code 03 but they would be cumulative, so if the level for Code 3 was 20 jobs this could be done over many days. In return and when engaged, all jobs offered would show destinations, to include EC5, E140, 07:00-10:00 SE75 "O" attributes etc etc. I have withdrawn the proposal but asked the BoM to consider future system re-writes being able to count cumulative jobs for a future proposal. After all we need something done with the almost current useless Code 03 facility.

Alan Nash (A95)
   Alan, no one appreciates your efforts more than I and your Nash’s Numbers over the years must have assisted many thousands of drivers. However, I have to say that your proposition would have had much opposition. Why would a driver bother booking into EC5 or SE75 when the point cab(s) can stay there until they get a roader going the way they want, when roaders are not quite as frequent as they once were? …Ed

Watching out for ‘clipboard Johnnies’
Whilst I'm sure many subscribers keep an eye on the PCO notices published by our masters at Penton Street, others might not have clicked their way through the TfL/PCO website recently. There have recently been some useful reminders about PH operations, both regarding operators and drivers, which, whilst we all know the rules they should operate under, serve as a useful reminder of the specifics that we should all find useful when reporting touting activities. It particularly helps clarify the 'Clipboard Johnnie' question - if it isn't the licensed premises - it's touting! If the clipboard approaches the punter - it's touting! 
   The obvious touts (with or without the yellow window stickers) are sadly an ever-present feature of our city and whilst we can report 'hot spots' to the Police/Carriage office we simply have to live the fact that there's the occasional headline grabbing 'Police clamp down' which disrupts their activities for an hour or two! However, the group I find most annoying are the smart suit brigade - the PHVs and their drivers around the posh bits of town. The PCO notices serve as a useful reminder that unless a passenger makes a booking themselves, by phone or in person at an operators address, the trip is illegal. Whilst I'm sure many hotels are licensed PHV premises, the rules still apply about who makes the approach. A doorman asking a guest leaving the hotel if they need a cab, then getting his smart PH mate to pick up the job is outside the law. 
   I'm sure we all know this, but if more complaints go in to the Police and Penton Street, we can hopefully regain some hotel, club and restaurant work from our ranks.
   Kinds regards and a Happy New Year!

James Griffin (T97)
Call Sign
has recently been in touch with the tout squad following one of DaC’s female drivers volunteering to go out with them to see how often she is approached outside clubs etc. For obvious reasons, I can’t give her name but if something comes of it, you will naturally read all about it here …Ed

RTG and Addison Lee
I won’t bore you with the reason I was looking, but if you go to Radio Taxis Group internet site, then click onto the London Taxi Times link, what do you find? An advert for Addison Lee. No joke! How this must please their driver/share holders…

Nick Steventon (J65)
Naughty Google I suspect! You can read bout Addison Lee elsewhere in this issue …Ed


Why are Camden breaking the law?

When Dial-a-Cab driver Martin Russell (T10) phoned Call Sign to tell us he had been sent a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) for doing a u-turn in Southampton Row, our initial response was to tell him to appeal as the signage had been incorrectly displayed for some time and it was still worth a shot.
   Our obvious question was to ask when the offence had taken 

place? To say we were astonished
to hear that it was almost six months earlier would be an understatement!
   We contacted Barrie Segal, the Founder of AppealNow.com. Barry has been a friend of DaC ever since his late mother was a regular and very satisfied user of the Westminster TaxiCard. On several occasions he has provided very useful advice for this magazine and its drivers and this time was no exception. He quoted the law:
   "Subject to the provisions of this section, no penalty charge notice may be served under this Act after the expiry of the period of 28 days beginning with the date on which the alleged contravention or failure to comply occurred."
   Barrie’s only comment was that
the PCN had therefore been
illegally issued! That leaves us with
the question: Why are Camden breaking the law by sending out-of-date PCNs? The answer is probably because they know that someone, somewhere will pay it and if they can get away with it, then they will. So always check
the date of any PCN and remember the above law.
   Another valuable lesson worth remembering is how much Barrie Segal can help. You can sign up for his monthly Insider's Parking Ticket Newsletter. It provides newsflashes and a 30 day money back guarantee for an annual subscription of £14.97.
   AppealNow.com
is also the only website in the world where you can appeal your parking ticket on line in 4½ minutes!

logthumb.gif (1312 bytes)

February 2009 Call Sign Home Page

Powered by NetXPosure


Copyright 1997-2009 Dial-A-Cab Ltd, All rights reserved.