COMPLIANCE OFFICER’S REPORT

Hello Ladies and Gents,

Suspended taxis
Before I update you on a few issues that have recently occurred, I must firstly mention the problems that many of you have encountered with early TX4’s (56 and 07 registrations). These taxis were suspended indefinitely by the Public Carriage Office on Friday 19th September and through no fault of your own, you were then unable to do the job you were qualified for.
   Talking to many of you since then, it appeared that whilst demand far outstripped supply, some garages that could still offer rented taxis were wildly profiteering from your misfortune. Every one of us needs to work to pay our bills, but reports of ‘N’ registration taxis offered out at two hundred and sixty pounds (£260) per week were not unfounded and quite honestly these people should be ashamed of themselves. As a working driver myself, I would be more than happy to publicise the names of the garages that have made small term profit from your misfortune. Maybe they will live to regret it in the long term when eventually things get back to normal and they have unused taxis on their forecourts that they wish to rent out. Please let me know if

Allan Evans
you feel you were charged or offered cabs at inflated prices.
   By the time you read this, most - if not all of the taxis - should have had the remedial work completed and should be back on the road. Can I ask all relevant members to inform Driver Services of the dates and duration that you were actually unable to use the radio, so that they are able to correctly adjust your subscriptions.

Incorrectly booking-in…
You will see from the latest complaints results listed in this edition of Call Sign that despite many terminal messages and warning in the magazine, a small number of drivers are still booking-in to physical ranks and zones incorrectly to gain an unfair advantage. Please remember that the GPS tracking system is regularly monitored and drivers that are in breach of procedure rules will be called to task – no more warnings will be given.

   Drivers also complain that there are certain regular trips in outer zones that they feel may not be allocated in an equal manner. Be sure that outer zones are being monitored; reports are now being run and if it can be proved that there is a specific driver who books in to a particular zone very early because he or she may have prior knowledge of the trip and accepts the trip on a regular basis, it will also lead to a complaint.
   Aggrieved drivers rightly bring most of these types of complaints to our attention and it is my job to investigate the problem in a fair and just way. Please remember that in a Complaints hearing, you are judged by your peers and none of us want to be ‘turned over’.

Credit cards
Finally, can I once again remind you that to ensure payment for a credit card trip, please remember these two important points:-
   1. If you are unable to swipe the card through the terminal, do not agree to undertake the journey.
   2. If you cannot print out a receipt through the terminal at the end of the journey, you must obtain a signed manual receipt that clearly shows the imprint of the card details and expiry date.

Allan Evans
DaC Compliance Officer
Allane@Dialacab.co.uk

Gary Bromelow is a partner and road traffic expert of Saunders Solicitors who are based in both Aldersgate and Great Titchfield Streets. He is happy to answer driver’s motoring legal questions sent via Call Sign…

ASK GARY…

Gary Bromelow

Question from Steve Hassan (P95) in last month’s Mailshot:
I read with interest the article in the September Call Sign on the Camden rip-off merchants, as I was one of those caught when the new u-turn restriction at the top of Southampton Row started. I still have details and sent off an email to Camden requesting my money back as the signage was now agreed to be inadequate. Needless to say they declined to reimburse me, even though I quoted Bob Stafford’s (N75) PCN details from the article. Camden state that the charge has been paid in full so they are not responsible, as the charge was not contested at the time. Where should I go from here? Surely if the signage is wrong and agreed to be so, then Camden should be charged with extortion?

Gary’s answer:
It is certainly an interesting position for a local authority to adopt that money is not required to be reimbursed where there has been a tacit admission that it was taken incorrectly in the first place. The concept in law allowing a public body to act in a certain manner is that they exercise any function within the limits of that power. Obviously, to demand and then accept a charge that is then shown to be unlawful and thereafter to refuse to reimburse that money means the Council are then acting in a manner that we lawyers call ultra vires, or outside their power. In a perfect legal world, all drivers affected would march off to the High Court with applications that the actions of the Council be reviewed, that they be held to be so unreasonable that no reasonable Council could act in such a manner and that the money should be returned at the order of the Court. Obviously this would be a massively expensive exercise and disproportionate to the actual level of charges so realistically I couldn't suggest that this route be taken.
   However, there is a more practical route that can be followed where somebody finds themselves in a dispute with a Local Authority. The Local Government Ombudsman has power to deal with Council’s when they act in a manner where they are at fault. Clearly this is just such a case. The first thing to do is to formally complain to the Council, I suggest that this be done in writing and that a copy of all correspondence is kept.
The complaint to the Ombudsman should be within twelve months of your matter for complaint arising
. The Ombudsman has real teeth as the powers for them to request documents are the same as those enjoyed by the High Court. There is no charge for their service and Council's almost inevitably follow their recommendations. I suspect that the mention of such a complaint, together with a liberal requesting of everybody's name who has been involved in the decision making process, should yield a favourable result.
A useful link to them is at http://www.lgo.org.uk/pdf/howcompcouncil.pdf.

Gary Bromelow
Saunders Solicitors

* Steve’s ticket is under a year and he’ll be trying Gary’s advice…


Click to browse the Dial-A-Cab Web Site

Call Sign Home Page

Page 26

Powered by NetXPosure


Copyright 1997-2008 Dial-A-Cab Ltd, All rights reserved.
Sells Louis Vuitton Vassili GM Store Louis Vuitton Albatros Toiletry Bag Louis Vuitton Pegase 55 Business Louis Vuitton Neverfull GM Cheap Louis Vuitton Albatros Toiletry Bag Alma PM Sale Buy Louis Vuitton Neo Bailey Aviation Louis Vuitton Cheap Louis Vuitton Bags Cheap Louis Vuitton Bags Louis Vuitton Cabas PM Louis Vuitton Bags on sale Authentic Louis Vuitton Handbag Louis Vuitton Bags on sale Louis Vuitton Olav PM Sale Louis Vuitton Organiser Atoll Outlets Sells Louis Vuitton Artsy GM Cheap Louis Vuitton Ceinture