COMPLIANCE OFFICERS REPORT |
||
Hello ladies and gents, E140 |
![]()
there are no excuses and no more
warnings will be given – it will be straight into a complaints
meeting to be judged by your fellow members. Those that
feel that they can continually flaunt the rules will sadly be in
for a surprise and I am sure that the committee members will be
strict in their judgement. |
up to date with many of the
Run-in reminder…
Allan Evans |
PARKING AND SMART CARS… |
||
Dial-a-Cab driver, Mike Holleyoake
(M06), recently wrote to his MP, Charles Walker
(Broxbourne), complaining about the apparent zero tolerance of
Westminster Council Mobile Surveillance Vehicles towards
taxi drivers after receiving three £120 parking tickets within
the space of just four weeks. In his letter, Mike suggested that those operating the Smart cars had "cottoned on" to the fact that London taxi drivers were "easy targets" and also suggested that they were paid by results. Mike was concerned that eventually the feeling among taxi drivers would become so strong that French-style militancy would be called for. Mr Walker passed on Mike’s feelings to Westminster Council and below is their response to him… Licensed London Taxi Drivers and Westminster Parking Regulations Thank you for your letter, which was addressed to Mr Peter Rogers, the Chief Executive Officer of the Westminster City Council (WCC). Mr Rogers has passed this letter to me in order for a full response to be given. I understand your constituent, Mr Holleyoake, has made |
representation to you regarding his concerns that the WCC is deliberately hampering licensed taxi drivers from carrying out their legitimate business. This accusation is not accepted. The council’s Parking Services team (PST) do hold public forums on regular bases. These meetings can be focused on particular user groups such as taxis, coaches, trades vehicles, private motorists etc or can be open to a broader spectrum of users. The principal objectives of these meetings are twofold; to allow the different users to express their concerns and suggestions and secondly they afford an opportunity for the PST team to assess what changes the motorists would like to see implemented. The last such forum which was focused on the taxi industry was extremely useful for both the PST and those in the taxi business, including drivers. Mr Holleyoake has stated his objections to the council’s use of mobile surveillance vehicles and that the drivers of these vehicles are paid on productivity related to the number of offences reported. This latter statement is untrue. The primary purpose of these vehicles, as of Parking Attendants, is to assist in traffic management in Westminster in accordance with |
the
1991 Road Traffic Act. The demands by all motorist living within, or visiting the area, are varied. It is in everyone’s interest that the PST takes appropriate measures to ensure that the regulations within the Act are enforced. In Westminster, taxi drivers have the freedom to stop in many places that other vehicles cannot, this covers only the period while the passengers are boarding or alighting. There is no set time limit and taxi drivers can stop for as long as is necessary for the passengers to get in or out. For instance, if ramps or a lift are needed to be used to allow a wheelchair user into the vehicle, the time taken to secure these is acceptable. Thank you for bringing this matter to my attention and affording me the opportunity to address Mr Holleyoake’s concerns personally. In conclusion, I would assure you that the City Council is committed to providing customer care to the highest standard possible at all times. We value feedback from our customers and endeavour to use this to improve continuously the quality of our service. Kevin Goad |
![]() |
Powered by NetXPosure |
Copyright 1997-2008 Dial-A-Cab Ltd, All rights reserved. |