Either write to Call Sign at Brunswick House or email us at
callsignmag@aol.com
Black cabs?
I recently received a date, time and place to pass my taxi, which was a week
before I had booked it in at the garage who look after it for me. I phoned
to cancel the appointment and the lady asked if it was a black cab?
Now that was like a red rag to a bull, because my present one is a nice
red! So when I said no, she said that is what she was told to ask because
that was what was shown on her screen.
I think it is about time that all of us put a stop to the phrase
black cab because it is both misleading and also very untruthful.
However, whilst all from the Mayor down are using it, I think I will go and
find a brick wall and talk to that, because I will get more sense from it!
Have you noticed in East Enders that when they phone for a
taxi, a car with a roof sign pulls up? Now that is misleading! Has somebody
in the BBC got a downer on our trade? The same goes for newspaper reporters
who do not check their facts when they write about private hire drivers and
call them taxi drivers or cab drivers. One of the proudest days of my life
was 17 July 1957 when I was handed a Green Badge with the words cab
driver on it. So it goes to say that nobody else, unless they have a
Green or Yellow badge, should be called a cab driver.
What I find strange is that nobody inside our trade really cares.
Can I also add a comment re the letter in Call Sign
from Yaqub Rafiq (April Mailshot). I think that we are very lucky that only
our badge number goes onto the printer receipt. When I travel abroad, I
always ask for a receipt so I can check how the fare differs from our
own. The most expensive was in Aurhuss Denmark and the cheapest in
Beijing. All of them show the cab number, time the trip started and ended,
the distance and in some cases waiting time ie stopping at traffic lights.
From a very grumpy 70 year old (but young at heart)…
Stanley Roth (Y53)
Stanley, you are wrong when you say nobody cares. I have gone on
about it for years, Stuart Pessok, Editor of TAXI has gone on about it for
years, the only difference being that Stuart still believes in it, whereas
the last time I wrote about it (April 2006), I quoted a DaC driver who had
changed his mind on the expression "black cabs" after a conversation with
his passenger, who had come out of JPM. It also changed my view – albeit
only slightly. The article read:
"Why," the passenger asked, "does the most famous and respected
taxi business in the world throw away its biggest advantage?" He went on to
explain to the DaC driver that the expression "black cabs" can and only does
apply to London Taxis and that so far as marketing was concerned, you could
not put a value on it. "Black cabs," he went on, "are known all over the
world as referring to London Taxis and you lot want to get rid of it! You
must be mad! Look how many tourists coming to London are advised to use
black cabs only?"
He also went on to query why we were using different colour taxis
when black is the traditional colour?
I still agree with you (and Stuart), but as much as it irritates me
to admit it, I also think the passenger has a valid point as well. We have
become ‘black cabs’ – like it or not. If anyone wants to add to the debate,
feel free to write in …Ed
To Cabtivate or not to Cabtivate – ask the Chairman!
Since reading the article in Call Sign about Cabtivate last
year, I was interested to know more. I made further enquiries as I was about
to buy a new taxi around October / November 2006 and the income generated
from Cabtivate would go some way towards the taxi repayments. On the
surface, it seemed to be a much better financial deal than Cabvision.
I did quite a bit of research, including speaking several times
with Cabtivate’s MD, Mr Greenhalgh at his office in Glasgow. He was helpful
in answering all of my queries, however, I still had a nagging feeling that
all was not well. Having to pay approximately £4,000 to lease the equipment
did not sit happily in my mind - or in my wallet!
Knowing that the cab trade is quite insular, I phoned Brian Rice and asked
if he knew anything about Cabtivate. Brian said he would make enquiries. At
the same time, news of the imminent release of the TX4 was filling the trade
press, stating that it would have headrests on the centre partition and
confirming what I had seen on a previous Call Sign / Virgin
Trains
sponsored trip to the LTI factory in Coventry last year (thank you Alan
Fisher).
Considering that the Cabtivate system was located on the centre
partition behind the driver’s head, it seemed to me to limit the future
success of the company. On pointing this out to Mr Greenhalgh, he
pooh-poohed my deduction. Yet another alarm bell rang for me.
The next day, Brian Rice called me as promised. After speaking with
Brian, I was left in no doubt not to continue with Cabtivate. Thanks to
Brian’s speedy and informative response, I am now £4,000 better off.
Malcolm Levan (F24)
I passed your letter on to Brian Rice. He mentioned something about
half of £4000 but possibly forgot to tell you! …Ed
PCO, SGS and Taxi licensing…
Further to your notices in Call Sign regarding taxi vehicle
licensing, which have been very helpful, here is my experience of the whole
fiasco over the past few weeks - and I’m still waiting for an appointment.
Below is a copy of the letter I sent to TfL for the PCO but which has yet to
be acknowledged…
Philip Smith (G51)
Phil’s letter to TfL is below. He doesn’t appear to have been the
only DaC driver to have had problems with the changeover – especially as the
PCO cocked up with the actual changeover dates. SGS finally got Phil’s
details on 4 April, but the earliest appointment he could get was 20 April
in Hanworth! Considering he lives in Bexleyheath and that would be almost
one month after his plate had expired, not too satisfactory. Deptford
wouldn’t have been bad, but that failed to open on time. Phil was given the
impression that slots would be made available for drivers who could not get
an appointment at the PCO in March, but that it just didn’t happen. The PCO
now say everything is running well …Ed
Phil Smith’s letter to the PCO/TfL
Dear Sir,
I’m writing to let you know of the saga I’ve been having trying
to get an appointment for the licensing of my cab. My plate ran out on 29
March so I went to my garage to book the cab in for its overhaul. KPM told
me that I should have received a letter from SGS with an appointment and to
come back when I received said letter. For one reason or another I don’t
pick up the trade papers as I work nights and do a lot of radio work. So I
|
was not up to speed on the latest changes, as I had not
received any letters from SGS. I went back to KPM a week later and this time
I was told go to the PCO. This I duly did and found out there were no
appointments to be had. The man at the appointments window told me that
plating stopped on 23 March, but they had extended it by a day, that there
are 150 drivers on the waiting list waiting for a cancellation and that I
will have no chance of getting an appointment! He suggested I phone SGS.
The next morning I phoned SGS and they informed me that they don’t
take over until 2 April and at that time the PCO would have sent over my
details. To be fair to them, they were helpful and gave me the number of the
Service Delivery contact at the PCO. I phoned them and after a short wait of
3 hours, someone finally answered the phone! I talked to a lady and
explained my situation; she questioned what could she do as SGS were taking
over in April? I phoned SGS again but still couldn’t book, as they didn’t
have my details. I phoned the lady at the PCO again pleading with her for
some advice as to what I should do? She took my home and mobile numbers and
promised that someone would contact me. Two weeks later and a week before my
plate expires, no one has called from the PCO with the advice I need. I’m
fuming now and called the PCO again, this time to complain. I want to talk
to Dave Stock, the man with the funny title of Head of Service Delivery!
WHAT SERVICE! I’m told that as he’s leaving at the end of the month, he
won’t be taking any calls. Angry as I am now, the word charming
springs to mind!
So here I am; no appointment and no help or advice from the PCO. My
only option is to book a mechanical with KPM and present the cab at my
nearest testing station myself, which would be Deptford! My plate runs out
on Thursday 29 and I'll work it till then, book my mechanical in with KPM for
Monday 2 April and phone SGS for an appointment. But KPM tell me they don’t
do overhauls on a Monday! I have to bring the cab in on Thursday. Peed off
big time now, I booked my cab in with another garage for 2 April.
Then on 2 April, I phone SGS to make my appointment but I
can’t, as the PCO haven’t sent my details over! I’m amazed to put it
mildly! SGS promise me that the PCO will send my details over later that day
and to phone the next day (3 April) and I can finally make my appointment.
With this news, I drove to Bethnal Green and dropped my cab off at the
garage. I hear the news that my nearest testing station – Deptford - isn’t
even open yet! I go round the corner to pay and change my meter like you do,
but I can’t as I now need a log book to do that! The meter people
tell me I should have had an information pack from the PCO telling me all
this! Er, sorry, but no pack dropped through my letterbox. So that’s another
job I can’t do. Anyway, I dropped the cab off at the garage and made my way
home.
Then 3 April and I phoned SGS to finally make my appointment and
the PCO still haven’t sent my details over!
Well, to sum up this sorry saga, I have a few questions I’d
liked answered. Firstly, what 3-year old or ex-bus driver dreamed up this
amazing new service that we pay through the nose for? Why couldn’t
commonsense break out at TfL? We could have had a smooth transition if the
PCO kept its doors open for plating for the first two weeks of April.
Why tell me that drivers were issued with a temporary extention to
their plate if they couldn’t find an appointment? I now know the reason why…
they don’t care!
Looking, as I did to find ways to contact TfL to complain and get
details from either them or the PCO is a nightmare! There are no email
addresses or contact telephone numbers. But if a member of the public wants
to complain against a taxi driver, then it’s as easy as pie!
Licensing is a good thing as it protects the public, but the
licensing authority is duty bound to give a service to the licensee! In my
case, I’ve been pushed from pillar to post by a totally shambolic PCO who
neither provide nor care. This handover was a total disgrace. Ed
Thompson should hang his head in shame or resign. Its high time we
had some taxi drivers on TfL who know and understand the workings of the cab
trade, ex-bus drivers just don’t cut the mustard in my book.
P. Smith
Call Sign emailed the PCO on Philip’s behalf with a copy of the
above letter and asking for someone to explain the situation. They phoned
him the following day telling him that they would be issuing temporary
plates for all drivers affected by the situation and which would be valid
for up to 50 days. We also had a response from Transport for London, which
suggests that they didn’t receive Phil’s letter until Call Sign
resent it. Their letter is reproduced below …Ed
Response from TfL re Phil Smith:
The Public Carriage Office held extra licensing sessions in the evenings and
on Saturdays throughout March and drivers whose licenses expired during that
period were given priority for appointments. Over 1,860 licensing sessions
were available (roughly the same number as would be available any other
month), exceeding the number of licenses expiring in March, and 1,740
licenses were renewed. These licensing arrangements were well publicised,
with two PCO notices published - one in January and one in February -
advising drivers what they needed to do. We recognise that this is a period
of transition and where drivers have had genuine problems, we are happy to
help. The PCO has offered to issue a temporary licence plate specifically to
those vehicles where the licence expired between 1 and 31
March 2007 and the PCO had been unable to process the renewal application
prior to the transfer of the service to SGS. These temporary plates allow
drivers to continue to work as normal until such time as a full licensing
inspection can be arranged. Anyone requiring a temporary plate should
contact the PCO contract management team on 020 7126 1638.
We did contact Mr Smith as soon as we received his letter and we
understand that he has now made arrangements for a temporary licence plate
to be issued.
Warning on parking
I recently received a £100 PCN whilst being parked on the north side of
Finsbury Square (the City Road side) at 3.30 in the afternoon. I was waiting
for my passenger and although there is a marked out bus stop that takes up
much room, I was careful not to park in it. After 30 minutes I was scrubbed
off. The PCN gives several possible reasons as to why you feel you had to
stop there, one of which is being "on hire." Even then there is no guarantee
that my appeal will be accepted, as the CCTV will not catch sight of the
passenger due to the scrub. So be careful out there. Perhaps I am being
paranoid, but remember, just because you are paranoid doesn’t mean they
aren’t out to get you!
Sid Nathan (K88)
Well I think they’re after you, Sid! …Ed
Receipts and badge numbers
Thank you for publishing and responding to my letter re badge numbers on
printed receipts April Call Sign). In your response you said:
"Whilst I have not heard of any complaints brought in the way you
suggest..." May I refer |
you to the letter written by a
certain Richard Potter in the December 2005 edition of Call Sign.
There is no PCO requirement for badge numbers to be on any
receipts. Why should I give
a hand written receipt to a 'legal' when we have been ordered to pay for and
install receipt printers? I and other drivers I have spoken to object to
this information being on DaC printed receipts. It is
unfortunate that the leading radio circuit is unwittingly assisting those
that would make false, malicious, complaints against DaC drivers. I would
like to ask the BoM to immediately instruct the IT Dept to re-programme the
software so that badge numbers are not shown on printed receipts. Instead,
why not print the driver’s call sign on the receipt?
Yaqub Rafiq (O28)
Brian Rice replies: I have never ever had a false accusation
regarding receipts levelled at one of my members! Why are you so nervous
regarding members of the public being aware of your badge number? After all,
you have to wear it whilst you are working! You say you have been
"ordered to pay for and install receipt printers." That is nonsense as DaC
installs your printer as part of the equipment we supply to you for your
monthly subscription. I also
see that you have 'dug out' a letter from Richard Potter in 2005 to
emphasise your point and my reply to Richard then is the same as it is to
you now - there has never been a problem! However, I must congratulate you
on your detective capabilities as Richard penned that letter in 2005 and I
notice that you have been with us for nine months - some time after the
original letter was written. In conclusion, I have every faith in my members
and the BoM do not have any intention of changing the way our receipts are
produced. We will not endeavour to rectify a problem that does not exist
House of Commons account
It was disappointing to hear that we've lost the
House of Commons account. We've given them a good service over the years.
Nothing's perfect and there has been the odd glitch, but overall we can be
proud of the way the account was serviced. But what was particularly galling
was the way in which it was lost. Having tendered with a modest increase to
reflect the tariff increase, we had the rug pulled out from under us with
Mountview undercutting our price by a reported 50p per mile. How on earth
can this be good for the trade? Whilst acknowledging that we work in a
competitive market, how do Mountview expect to cover the work at £2.80 per
mile on tariff 3? It remains to be seen how they manage it, but what's the
betting that we see cars in Old Palace Yard doing OUR work? Surely the time
has come for the Licensed Taxi circuits to come to a consensus on price.
This way we can be judged on the service we provide. If our service levels
drop and we subsequently lose accounts, so be it, that will be down to us.
Until such consensus, our clients will continue to play one off against the
other with the only loser being the driver. BoMs, CoMs, Sales Executives -
call them what you will - do not see a reduction in their salaries or
call-in rates because they are offering cut price deals, the only ones who
lose are the life-bloods of the circuits, the drivers, who continue to see
their operating costs rise but are expected to work for less.
But maybe, just maybe, if the circuits can get their act together
we can stop this ridiculous policy of maintaining the services levels of
minicabs by covering the work they can’t. Let them struggle and when their
customers complain then we can offer our services and tell them what they
tell their customers - that service comes at a price. It’s bad enough being
shafted by the Licensing Authority who seem hell bent on putting more and
more obstacles in our way, but to see our own who think we can work for
peanuts is particularly disappointing.
Paul Jenner (L19)
Brian Rice replies: I think you know my sentiments regarding the
topics you have raised, Paul, that's why we didn’t go in with cheap prices.
There is also a problem with getting all the circuits to agree – it’s called
a cartel and is totally illegal. Having said that, I couldn't possibly see
the other two circuits agreeing even if it were legal, because as you know,
they both operate with cars!
Ranking in E14
I am new to the circuit and would appreciate some
advice on Canary Wharf rank (E14C). I was recently ordered to book off from
this rank as I was not physically on it even though I was second cab from
point. Am I on the rank when I put on to the rear part or do I have to wait
until I reach the front part, which holds four cabs before I book in? If it
is the latter this does not make sense for the following reason. Suppose
there are no Dial-a-Cab taxis on the front part and a job is sent out. Who
will it go to? Will it go to cabs that are somewhere else in E14 or even
farther away? This cannot be good for the customer or for our reputation if
they are in a hurry and see DaC cabs on the rear part of the rank, but none
of them are for him. Could you please advise me of the rules regarding this
rank or indeed any others where this problem could arise. I suspect the
driver in front of me who should have been number one thought I was trying
to jump the queue and I wasn't.
Tom Reynolds (O85)
Tom, welcome to DaC and Call Sign. The answer to your
question is that both portions of the rank on the left side of the roadway
are classified as E14C. Cabs parked on the right (where it says no cabs to
wait) cannot book in! It sounds as if you booked in too quickly and was
asked to book off to allow the cab in front to get that position …Ed
Last year … this year… next year?
In last month’s Call Sign, the Chairman wrote that in the
first five months of the current financial year, our turnover has increased
by £3.4million – 19% up on the same period last year. However, in the same
issue and in reply to a letter I wrote to Mailshot, the Chairman claimed
that the increase in turnover going to our members this year through
Concierge will be in excess of £11.4million. This would mean £6.3million
more, an increase of well over 100%. These figures seem to indicate that
Concierge is being expanded at the expense of all other business.
Brian Cohen (C81)
Brian, I’m not sure if your letter is a wind-up, but surely you
realised that the response Brian Rice gave you last month was totally made
with his tongue firmly in his cheek! You asked him how much of his estimated
Concierge increase to £15 – 20million this year would go to the drivers in
taxi work? His comment referring to crystal balls as being the latest in
technology was supposed to give you a hint that it was impossible to give an
answer as the clients hadn’t yet phoned! Surely
his answer of £11,426,394.20p would have given a further clue!
However, whatever it is, are you complaining that Concierge is
giving us too much work? …Ed |