Mailshot is your chance to
tell the subscribers of Dial-a-Cab exactly what you think. Complaints, compliments or just
to write about Call Sign. This is YOUR paper within your magazine....
You can also email your letters to: callsignmag@aol.com
Minimum
Fares
I have shared some correspondence with the Chairman regarding minimum fares.
Perhaps I could point out one issue. Last year each job I worked for DaC
cost me £2.45, taking into account trips against subscriptions. Add that to
the equation and the minimum fare then becomes £6.35 for approximately 45
minutes work. Surely, as a Society, we should do everything we can to make
the hourly rate for radio work more financially attractive than street work.
Richard Potter (T51)
Thanks for the
letter Richard, but surely your equation is built around someone who doesn’t
do much account work? By some estimates I am almost a part-timer working
between 5 and 6 hours a day, 6 days a week in between working on Call Sign.
During that period I average around 135 credit trips a month. By my
estimation, that works me out at around 96p per trip – an amount I find very
reasonable for what I get. According to your figures and my rather shaky
maths, I estimate that you do around 53 jobs a month. If you only did the
minimum of 40 trips per month, they’d then work you out at £3.25 per trip
whereas if like some Cole Porters (night and day!) you did around 200+ trips
each month, then the cost to you would be around 65p or less. The point is
that everyone’s figures are different and the more account trips you do, the
cheaper it becomes – minimums have very little to do with it. I can’t speak
for the day men, but so far as I am concerned as an evening shift driver,
the minimum very rarely comes into force as most account trips are
substantially above the £8 mark…Ed
FSA
Investigation and Petitions
How I agree with you over the
conduct of Messrs Cox and Gillam (May Call Sign; Drivers have DaC
investigated – but why). I've said for a long time that our greatest
strength (democracy) is also our greatest weakness. We still don't know how
much this has cost us financially, although I suspect it will be quite
substantial. Why anyone would want to stand for the Board to represent
drivers like that is beyond me. Perhaps we should be grateful for those that
do! I hope your next edition carries the news that these “brave” men have
resigned. Paul
Jenner (L19)
I’ve just read your article
about the FSA, Tony Gilliam and Darryl Cox and I totally agree with you.
These men have made a very serious accusation, which proved to be unfounded
after an intensive investigation. The way they obtained the signatures to
get the process started was by deceit and deception, which makes them the
dishonest ones and then they have the front to run for the Board!
Messrs Gillam and Cox should do the honest thing, fall on their
swords and leave NOW!
I’m interested as to why they have not been put on complaint, as
the handy little complaints list you have just printed shows they
have broken the following:
Rule 2: Conducting him/herself in a manner likely to bring the society into
disrepute.
3: Conduct liable to prejudice the Society.
25: By conduct or actions liable to disrupt the smooth running of
any Department of ODRTS.
I think there is enough there…
Mickey Lappin (E46)
Well done on naming and
shaming the FSA two, they should be expelled for bringing the Society into
disrepute. John Paul
Pace
Having
been connected with ODRTS for over 50 years, firstly as a driver-subscriber
followed by Board membership and finally a journeyman, I am absolutely
disgusted with two of the member’s actions. I have spoken to my good friend
and former chairman Mr Jack Russell with regard to the actions that could be
taken against these individuals and one of the ways that these two so-called
fellow drivers could be brought to book is to charge them with bringing the
circuit into disrepute. That's just for starters and I am quite sure that
with the hundreds of genuine subscribers DaC have, that there well could be
other charges.
Sam Harris (ex-S95J)
I
must apologise to the Board and my fellow subscribers because like
Michael Pollington (K17) in the May Call Sign, I also signed
the petition against Concierge. I, like others, had genuine concerns about
it. I must add that I’m now all in favour of Concierge after hearing the
truth about it at the AGM. It has come to my attention that I could remain
anonymous as the Board never got to see the signed petition, but I don’t
like being conned and have nothing to hide. I was approached on EC5 by a
fellow driver (I use that term loosely) to sign a petition to call an EGM to
fully question the Board on this new system. Only after I was assured by the
driver there was 100% proof that minicabs were given preference over taxis,
did I sign.
Over the past 18 years - of which 16 have been on Dial-a-Cab - I have signed
many petitions and been on many drive-ins. Had there been any mention to me
that my signature was to be used to call in the FSA, I would have refused
wanting no part it! My signature has been used fraudulently and action needs
to be taken against those that stole it. It seems to me that this was a
carefully orchestrated plan to deceive and dupe 100 drivers out of their
signatures under the guise of Concierge, when the people concerned knew
fully they were going to use the signatures to call
in the FSA.
Would it be possible to collate all the signatures from those that signed? A
signed form stating that there was never any mention of the FSA from all the
drivers that signed all singing the same tune, could possible be used by the
Society or our solicitors to bring the culprits before a complaints hearing
or a court of law. Of course, there are sympathisers that would have signed
anything and there are the ones who talk a good fight but don’t want to see
their names mentioned.
We have been given a clean bill
of health by the FSA and those concerned must now realise that no one driver
is bigger than this Society, so why don’t they now resign? It really is
pathetic how individuals can to be so driven by personal vendettas against
certain Board members. Perhaps an EGM should be called and put it to a vote,
do we want them on or off? A lesson learnt…
Colin
Jenkins (Y22)
In reference to
the letter in the May edition of Call Sign, I too was asked to sign a
petition regarding the full disclosure of the use of minicabs, Concierge and
Dial-a-Cab. I was not told that my name would be forwarded to the FSA or any
other body for investigation. The situation re Concierge was fully explained
at the AGM. Like the letter writer, I too feel that my signature was
obtained unfairly even though I too hold my hands up for not reading the
documents thoroughly (I was putting a job in my cab at the time). Some may
say that I am writing this letter to cover my own back as the BoM have no
idea who the signatures belong to, but that is not the case. Since it became
known that I was unhappy about the way my signature
was
misused, I have been approached on three separate occasions by people
connected to the petition as to what did I think I was doing? Everybody has
a right to their own opinion, it's called freedom of speech…
Stewart Lewis (D20)
One-sided Reporting?
After reading
your last article in Call Sign about Daryl Cox and Tony Gillam, I was
surprised that it all seemed so one-sided. You say that you had a long chat
with the Chairman about how these two individuals have brought our Society
into disrepute with the FSA, but as you say, there is no smoke without fire.
So how about a balanced piece of journalism and interview Mr Cox and
Mr Gillam and find out what led them to be driven to complain to the FSA in
the first place.
And just a quick one for Mr Rice - In your last article you
said how worried
you were about the growth about private hire! Then why start Concierge,
which gives private hire.
a) a foot in the door at an account they would normally never get a
look in; and
b) out of
40,000 jobs we only cover 11,000 in taxis while giving private hire 29,000 jobs. It seems we
are only helping private hire grow with your blessing, whilst not looking
after Dial-a-Cab drivers for which you are paid to do.
Lee Owen
(V51)
Thanks for the
letter Lee, however I think you have grabbed the wrong end of the stick. No
one has criticised Messrs Cox or Gillam for collecting the signatures. That
is their right as DaC subscribers. All the drivers who have written to me
and the many others who have phoned claim that they signed for an EGM to
talk about Concierge. But none of them were apparently told that the
petition would be going to the FSA. Had the twosome wanted to approach the
Registrar of Friendly Societies on their own behalf, no one could have
complained. They instead used the 100 signatures, of which we assume many
signatories were unaware. They could have sent their views to Call Sign, as
many did when Concierge was first announced, but they chose not to. It is
not unbalanced reporting, it has nothing to do with reporting. I have
already received a letter from their solicitor asking me to retract the
column I wrote in the May issue under the Heading of A Personal Point of
View. I can’t do that because I do not believe that I have created a
false image of the situation.
As for your
second point, Lee, you have proved that my Editorial on this issue’s page 3
re writing about DaC matters in papers other than Call Sign, is dangerous
unless you get the facts correct. Grant Davis’s article, from which you have
taken your figures from in The Badge, was totally incorrect. For your
information, we didn’t “only cover 11,000” jobs in taxis, we covered an
EXTRA 11,000 trips. As for PH “getting a foot in the door at an account they
would normally never get a look in,” well, as has been documented in this
mag several times before, they have been servicing the account for years.
The only difference with Concierge is that in addition to DaC gaining much
extra work, the PH companies have to pay us for work that they would have
already got anyway. Not quite how Grant’s article read, was it? …Ed
The Cab Driver From Hell!
Thank you
for including my “Credit Ride from Hell" article (May Call Sign).
I must say that reading the article in the magazine has definitely improved
my sense of humour and now I can see the funny side! Please compliment Jery
for his interpretation of the lady in question, the likeness is uncanny!
I have
included my attempt at this month's crossword ready for inclusion in the
winner's draw should the answers prove correct. Hope springs eternal.
May 1 also
take this opportunity to congratulate you on Call Sign and ensure you the
magazine is read by all the family, even the retired members and it is the
envy of the many friends I have in the trade who are not on our circuit.
Please continue to spread the word.
Regarding
your ‘Personal Point of View’ on page 10, I agree whole-heartedly with your
comments. I can never understand why people will continue to knock and try
to smash anything which causes them to display such heights of jealousy. The
current Board has proved over the years to be extremely successful, both for
the Society and all the membership in general. May they long continue to do
so.
The only
fear I have is in the future should any of the present Board decide to stand
down or be replaced. Where does one look to replace them? The search and
responsibility for the future of the Society must be done very, very
carefully. Indeed our search must be for men of integrity and at all times,
a deep sense of humour. The London Cab Trade has many such characters in its
midst, so let us hope that the right ones are members of Dial-a-Cab to carry
forward this Society and achieve
|
the successes to come.
Roy Webb (Dan 42)
Thanks for the letter. I’m
afraid you weren’t one of the finalists in this month’s crossword, but then
again neither were 443 others!…Ed
Just Wondering About Nuala!
I
am a reader for regular times of your magazine on the Internet. I drive a
taxi in Poland and for us there is nothing to read, but I have found your
magazine of which I am interested for London taxis. I also like to see more of Just Wondering
lady, Nuala. She has lovely face and would make for me a lovely friend.
Andrze
Kildynski,
Krakow,
Poland
Sorry pal, I’m
not too sure about your motives. Besides, Nuala doesn’t go in for Pole
dancing! …Ed
Crash Repairs…
After my recent crash, I would
like to thank Shelagh and Nuala for all their help in getting me back on the
road and also for the beautiful flowers that were sent to my house. My wife
loved them! Many thanks…
Gerald
Ward (G53)
Unusual Hobby?
As a taxi
enthusiast, it is with interest that I regularly read the online version of
Call Sign. It is always an enjoyable and informative read. I am based in
Liverpool and there are no regular trade magazines available. I find this
both surprising and disappointing when you consider that Liverpool has
Britain's largest taxi fleet outside of London.
I do believe that
my hobby is extremely unusual, but I collect all sorts of taxi paraphernalia
as well as taking photographs of taxis and recording their details. I’m
looking forward to visiting London for the first time later this year to see
how the world's finest taxi system runs.
One thing that
impresses me a great deal is the professionalism shown by Dial-a-Cab, both
with their customer operations and their excellent trade magazine – Call
Sign. This clearly is the ultimate in radio circuits, far greater than any
that operate in my neck of the woods!
The main reason
for me contacting you is to ask a favour. I would be extremely grateful if
you could send me a hard copy of Call Sign to add to my collection of taxi
trade magazines. If you could, please send me an email letting me know
whether you are able to do this, I will forward you my postal address.
Many thanks for
your time and interest.
Ross
Campbell
The Wirral,
Merseyside
Thanks for the
letter, Ross. I cannot put you on the mailing list but have sent you our
latest issue together with several European taxi magazines that I doubt you
have seen before. Incidentally, Ross has a very interesting website at
taxipix.fotopic.net …Ed
Salieri Visit
I recently
visited the Salieri Restaurant that you advertise in Call Sign and we really
enjoyed our meal. Not only was the service excellent, but the attentive
staff were very friendly – something most unusual in London restaurants. The
food was plentiful, delicious and served up within minutes of our arrival
and ordering – very important when you have tickets to visit the theatre
afterwards.
I would
certainly recommend the Salieri and of course, don’t forget to take your
badge or Bill to get a whopping and genuine 25% discount! That more than
paid for the theatre program, popcorn and an ice cream in the theatre!
Gerry Dunn MBE (S84)
Thanks for letting us know Gerry.
If any DaC drivers visit the Salieri, don’t forget proof of your DaC
membership and also to tell your passengers how good they are …Ed
Who Are the Mugs (Part 3)
I
would like to reply to Mr Frankel's and Mr Fisher's letter and comments in
April and May’s issues of Call Sign. First off Mr Frankel, learn to read; my
name is BEEVOR, not Beaver as in the little rodent you have so typically
interpreted me as. Your comments are both inaccurate and inappropriate and
in my opinion, somewhat bigotry. For someone who calls himself a genius, it
is somewhat surprising you cannot differentiate between the two. Please
allow me to educate you, you pronounce my name BEE-VOR. It is an Anglo Saxon
name
meaning to live by or near, it also partly derives it name from Belvour, a
place in Leicestershire. So as you can see, no connection with little furry
rodents. The motto of the name is nil desperandum (never despair).
Unfortunately I don't think I can uphold this motto with you!
With
regards to your letter, I do not speak for you or the trade and am not under
the impression that I do, unlike you who seems to do for the more ‘senior
drivers’ (April Call Sign).
I would never do this, especially if they displayed your type of attitude
when raising a few points. You have made a similar point yourself in April's
Mailshot with regards to emissions and Steve Norris's exclusive interview.
But with all due respect, what he said was just sound bites. It’s easy for
him to say what he said as he didn't get elected, neither had he a chance of
being elected. And you seemingly agree with the man who was alleged to have
said that the London taxi trade is a relic of the dinosaur age and needs to
go. However you do agree that senior drivers will find it “unprofitable,”
“unrewarding” and will be “working much harder to earn the same money.” And
you again “speak for the senior driver” by saying something many of you will
be loathe to do. Well sorry Stanley, but it looks like senior drivers will
have to work 5 or 6 days and up your hours by about 4 a day or return your
badge. You thought it was a joke about not being able to make a living? It
aint so funny
now, is it Stanley? So welcome to the 21st century of cab driving. I have an
idea - why don't you accompany me to the Carriage Office so that when I ask
for my £20 flag drop, you can ask for a senior driver waver on a new Euro
III conversion. That sounds just as reasonable to me, but then again as you
say, you can come and go as you please, can't you Stanley?
I
would also like to pick you up on your comments about Heathrow. Do you
seriously think the charge is to park? So you wouldn't mind then if
Paddington charged you £3.50 to “park on their feeder rank or Kings Cross,
Euston, Victoria etc? But don't fret Stanley, you will get £1back
from the passenger!
I did
take over 3 years to do the Knowledge, something I’m not ashamed of and I
congratulate you in only taking 12 months, you must have studied very hard.
Well Mr Frankel, I have news for you; Queen Victoria's dead and times have
changed! Not only have times changed, but so has the cab trade and it not as
solitary and as lucrative as in your early years. And definitely not a 3-4
day a week job with £50-60 airport rides thrown in. The words minicab,
Addison Lee and Blueback spring to mind.
I
started my April letter with the responses and attitudes I get from other
drivers, all I did was write a letter on what I thought and believed and you
made a mockery of my name and judged my
intelligence because you did the Knowledge quicker. Thank you Mr Frankel for
being the
perfect example of what I was talking about…
Mr
Fisher, your end of letter comments in April's mag did seem to me to display
a touch of
hypocrisy, which was surprising because didn't you phone me and ask me to do
a whole article and take my photo for the mag saying I raised some very good
points? Or was your negative comment more due to the fact I did not wish to
take part in your photo shoot after all? Mmmmmm…I guess I will never know!
Michael
Beevor (N76)
You’ll never know? Of course you
will Michael, because I’ll tell you! You wrote a very interesting piece for
the April issue and I thought it could have gone in as a separate article,
but if you look at the back issues you’ll see that I like to put the
driver’s photo with any article, much for the same reason that I rarely use
“name and address supplied” letters – people tend to disbelieve them! You
kindly posed, but then said that you didn’t want the photos published –
rather a waste of time for my photographer who had arranged to meet you, but
it was your choice. So I decided to put it in as a letter. Nothing was cut
out and it read exactly the same. My view on it hasn’t changed either – I
thought you made some good points, but surely in such a long letter (to give
you an idea, it contained 967 words as against 745 in your current letter
with the average letter containing around 300 words), surely you couldn’t
expect me to agree with every sentence? I do still think this is a great job
and that comparing it to an electrician who may have to travel 30 – 40
minutes to get to a job and then go back afterwards, is pointless. But I
published your views, that’s what Mailshot is – a forum of views. It would
be rather dull if we all agreed 100% with each other’s views and I hope that
you will continue to write in. As for Stanley…well he is Stanley and
speaking of him …Ed
Stan (Not) the Man?
With regards to Mr Stanley Frankel
(K46), or is it Jack as in I’m alright Jack? Right, so you’re the man that
tells everyone it takes a year to do the knowledge and every ride out to
the airport
averages £50-£60? No wonder we taxi drivers are seen as rich and arrogant. I
don’t remember Mr Beevor asking for a £20 flag drop, but I do think a £2.20
drop is an insult to my intelligence - let alone yours. I believe that it’s
drivers like you that are responsible for giving the general public the
impression of us that they have. For example, my neighbour the taxi driver
does 3 rides out of Heathrow a day at £50-£60 a go and is back at home in
time for tea and countdown!
Cheers Jack.
“Carry on” the good work!
Nick
Steventon (J65)
I’m not sure that I’d mention Stanley and Countdown
in the same letter! …Ed
Parking in the City of London
I have
today (June 1) received a PCN from the Corporation of London for a parking
contravention on May 3 in Old Bailey (Parked or loading/unloading in a
restricted street where waiting and loading/unloading restrictions are in
force). This PCN arrived on my doormat 29 days after the alleged
offence. After checking my records, I found I was on an account job for one
of our clients at the north end of Old Bailey and was waiting outside the
account address. A camera operator observing pictures from a roadside camera
recorded the “offence”. Fortunately for me, the PCN will be covered by DaC,
but my concern is for how long can DaC afford to keep paying £50 fines for
what could be every job picked up from the two account addresses in this
part of Old Bailey as they are both on this restricted area. My other
concern is about the amount of time passed before receiving the notice, no
photographic evidence is supplied with the PCN and with a four week delay,
most of us I think will have forgotten any details that could help in the
case of an appeal.
What can
be done to put a stop to us at DaC having to subsidise the Corporation of
London every time we service this and similar accounts in the city of
cameras in the future?
Bill Kibble (K86)
See response to the letter below …Ed
…And Everywhere Else!
I’m prompted to
write to you after watching BBC's Whistleblower programme about dodgy
parking attendants. It seems that different boroughs have different rules as
to when a ticket can ‘legally’ be issued. It all seems a bit confusing to
me, for example I’m led to believe that some boroughs allow you to stop for
5 minutes and others for 6 on a single yellow line. In addition, some
boroughs will allow motorists returning to their cars to escape a fine if
the ticket is not actually yet on the vehicle. We’ve all heard wardens say:
“You are to late, I have entered the details into the system.” We then
accept the ticket (well I do anyway), but I now hear that legally this is
incorrect. I would like to suggest, if possible, that you print an article
in Call Sign explaining in easy terms the allowances for each borough, ie
Kensington/Chelsea 5 mins on single yellow, 2 mins on double etc and ticket
not legally binding unless printed and placed on vehicle etc. I hope you get
my drift and hope you don’t think I’m a bit cheeky by suggesting you do all
the hard work, but I think it might be interesting reading.
Gary Johnson (P28)
Cheeky? Of course
not Gary! Whilst your suggestion makes good sense in a perfect world, the
one we live in isn’t quite so perfect and neither are the timepieces of the
Parking Attendants! Your 5 minutes may not be the same as theirs, so any
“chart” would be useless. However, as Camden seem to be our biggest “enemy”
when it comes to parking, I asked them for an official viewpoint on taxis
waiting, picking up and setting down. This is what their press office told
me…
“Taxis are permitted to wait for so long as may be necessary to
enable the passenger to get in
|
or out of the vehicle or to load or unload their personal luggage.
Essentially
taxis can only stop whilst a passenger is getting in or out of the taxi. If
it is clear to the Parking Attendant that there is no visible sign of a
passenger or the taxi driver, then they
would be entitled
to issue a PCN instantly. Hackney licensed cabs are also permitted to pick
up or drop off at bus stops, however, private hire cabs are subject to the
same enforcement action as any other vehicle with regard to bus stops. A
twenty
minute 'observation time' is applicable to commercial vehicles
undertaking loading/unloading on single or double yellow lines but is not
applicable to vehicles dropping off or picking up.
In order for a
PCN to be valid, it must be either affixed to the vehicle or handed to the
driver. If a parking attendant is physically prevented from issuing the PCN
it is still legally valid.”
My interpretation
of that would be that if you are waiting to pick up your passenger in a no
parking zone, then do an AAR and so long as the warden can see you, then you
are “picking up a passenger” and entitled to wait. And did you read the use
of their word instantly? That might answer your “5 minute” question.
However, Gary, if I’m wrong then I’m not going to pay your fine! …Ed
Taxi Text Service for the Deaf?
Anna
Constantinou, who I believe has written for Call Sign on the problems deaf
people have in using taxis, has suggested I contact you to see whether taxi
companies would consider accepting SMS cab bookings? Such a service would be
very helpful to deaf people and enable them to call for a cab wherever they
are, independently without having to look for an accessible public payphone
or to ask a hearing person to make the call on their behalf. The calls could
be verified by the taxi company replying to the SMS and we very much hope
that your Chairman, Brian Rice, will give positive consideration to this
request.
Ruth
Myers,
Chair,
Telecommunications Action Group (TAG)
Brian
Rice informs me that DaC will indeed be providing a text service in the
future, however it will have to take its turn, as there are other programmes
that are equally as important …Ed
DaC Twins Link up with Lost Family – Thanks to Call Sign!
I am
pleased to advise you that Herbert (C83) and Kurt (B80) have made contact
with relatives in both America and Argentina who have been looking for us
for over 40 years.
You will
probably have by now been advised of the Call Sign Magazine link by Joe
Davidson in New York. We would wish to convey our sincere thanks to Nuala (DaC
Driver Services) particularly from Dan Mayer in New Jersey, for the very
helpful manner in which she managed his original enquiry
Herbert
Goldschmidt (C83)
You can
read the story elsewhere in this issue …Ed
Lenny Bell
I was very
sad to read about Lenny Bell (Call Sign on-line, April). We
would come across one another from time to time and have a chat, he was also
one of the drivers that I trained at
Dial-a-Cab. Please pass on my condolences to his family.
Your
article about expensive London was an eye opener! My sister-in-law and her
family are planning a trip to the UK in 2006, so I was able to give her an
idea of what costs to expect! We are now in autumn here in Oz, which means
night temps of approx 10c and days of around 27c. I saw on the net recently
that you had a day temp of 27c and it's summer!
We are now
renting a house nearer to my garage. It is a 3-bedroom, two-bathroom
bungalow on 3/4 acre with a swimming pool. for A$250 (£100) a week. A stark
contrast to UK rents! My eldest son is paying the same for a one-bedroom
house in Abbots Langley!
Howard
Sales (ex-A11)
Queensland, Australia
You
couldn’t send the bungalow over here, could you? …Ed
Congratulations Poppy
May I
congratulate Poppy in her piece in the May edition of Call Sign regarding
fear of immigration. I think she speaks for the silent majority on this one;
it is so easy to blame immigration for all the problems we encounter in
society. We should be proud to say we welcome immigrants and as she says,
they do the poorly paid jobs we don't want to do. Her words were a joy to
read at a time of very negative debate on this subject. Well done for
publishing them.
Michael
McRedmond
London Taxi Finance
Like all Call
Sign contributors, Poppy has the freedom to give her honest views and she
never fails to do so! In October 2003 she wrote of the plight of
Mordechai Vanunu, the Israeli
“spy” who was sentenced to 11 years solitary confinement for telling the
Sunday Times about Israel’s secret nuclear arsenal in 1986. He had been
a technician at the power station in Dimona, but left with photos of the
underground nuclear reprocessing plant and followed his conscience. Four
weeks after Poppy’s story, the national press became interested!
…Ed
Running for Work?
There I
was one afternoon in Ropemaker Street, drinking my coffee and being halfway
through my copy of the Encyclopaedia Britannica while hanging up for a job
in EC2, when a job appeared on my terminal from a back-up zone to pick up at
Lower Thames Street going to SW1. The job was 14 minutes old and had a £3.80
run-in. I would have had to restart my meter several times to get there
while struggling through the afternoon traffic. I wondered about going to
voice and asking for a premium, but knew the request would be declined so I
rejected the trip offer. This type of thing is happening time and time
again. Obviously the BoM have instructed dispatchers not to give drivers any
incentives to cover the work because they feel that we should cover it no
matter what. If DaC are doing so well as reported in Call Sign, why is it
not in our best interest to get the work covered as in the good old busy
days when we certainly used to get premiums / increased run-ins? Why not
now? It’s like dangling a bottle of milk in front of a toddler and then
snatching it away!
My other
point is regarding new accounts. I read Lydia Foulkes article in the last
issue. She stated that we should look out for trips that said “new account”
on the job offer, so I looked out for them with eager anticipation. The
first two I received with “new account” on were both from clients that we
had had for a long time (AXA and BP). Why are existing accounts coming up as
new accounts? The next time I’m offered 75 London Wall, will it say new
account? Or is this a ploy to make us look busier than we are?
Brian Cohen (C81)
Lydia
Foulkes replies:
Many thanks for
taking the time to write, Brian. This year we have seen our fares increase
by 5.4%, are you proposing that we increase the run-ins further because I
really do not believe that new customers would wear this? Our service is
already 'premium' in a very competitive industry. I’m delighted that you
have raised the point regarding new accounts. I was unaware that all new
accounts are being highlighted and as you rightly point out, AXA and BP are
long standing customers that have obviously just opened additional accounts
for a division or location perhaps. I will try to ensure this does not
happen in the future.
We recently went live with AMV in NW1 - a £700k account, Bircham Dyson Bell
(£150k) over in Victoria, while Withers in Holborn (£60k) is now up and
running, just to name a few. I am pleased to report that both Natalie and I
are very busy developing other large accounts, sometimes it takes clients
time to make their decision and it can be frustrating not to be able to tell
you about those. However, as I said, it is a big decision for a customer to
change supplier and I do not want to jeopardise any future accounts by
'bragging'. Rest assured we win business because we offer excellent all
round service, so I would ask that you continue to support the radio and not
reject any trips.
Roman Way
Re the fleet message saying that
the Roman Way is now open for us long suffering nightmen later into the
evening. Firstly, the service was very much improved - both quick and
efficient. I thought this was the cure to all my problems until the very
next evening when I was booked off EC5 zone for not being able to accept or
reject a job offered. Please, no more upgrades until you sort the signal
problems out…
Michael
Lester (L74)
Brian Rice
replies: I‘m glad that you believe things have improved at Roman Way,
Michael. However, I am sorry to learn that you were 'booked off' the
Finsbury, but if you care to remember that even when we were on voice the
cab on the point of the Finsbury was told to 'move up' as the despatcher was
not receiving him. Unfortunately, it is a problem that we have always had in
that area - and I am sorry to say, will probably always have. However, that
does not mean that we are not endeavouring to rectify the situation.
An Open Letter to Brian Rice
Dear Brian
I am
writing to you today in the hope of some answers concerning DaC and our
affiliation with Private Hire.
In your
Chairman’s Report prior to the AGM, you stated that because DaC did not have
the financial burdens of running a car company, this helped us to stay in a
more healthy position. When you consider that one of our competitors has
recently revealed losses of some £800,000 for their new executive car
company, this statement made complete sense. So imagine my surprise when in
Call Sign Magazine you stated that because one of the car companies on
Concierge was under-performing, you feel that the way forward is now for us
– yes, licensed Taxi drivers – to pay for the formation of a PH company.
Please,
Brian, can you explain to me why the 360° turnaround and also, why would DaC
drivers want to fund more opposition? Surely as Chairman of DaC, should you
not be trying to put work into the backs or our taxis?
Grant Davis (L39)
Brian
Rice replies: Grant, you do have a funny way of misunderstanding what people
actually write! I can understand the spoken word being misheard, but when
things are
in 'black and white' it can be re-read so that the true facts are obtained
from the article. I agree that I have always resisted calls to start a car
company with the financial burden that might incur and I know you will agree
with that sentiment. However, what I actually wrote in the Chairman's report
was that 'some' and not 'one' of the car companies were under performing and
then wrote - and I quote: “Consequently, perhaps the time is approaching
when we should have our own DaC Car Company so that we have control over the
service that is provided to the customer?” Grant, the
quote was a question - it finished with a question mark. It was not a
statement. There is a big difference. I then went on to add, and again I
quote: “Not only would it be good for Dial-a-Cab, it would also be good for
the few 'cavemen' that we have on the circuit! After all, they would then
be in a position once again to make personal attacks on me and perhaps even
start another petition.” Enough said…!
I’ve Won a Telly!
On behalf
of my wife Pat and myself, I’d like to thank Alan and all at Call Sign for
the 42inch plasma TV that I recently won. The only problem I had was in
having to knock down the dividing wall between the dining and living rooms
to enable us to appreciate this wonderful prize. However, once the final RSJ
is installed, I feel sure that we will spend many-a-winter’s night
appreciating this marvel of modern technology!
Thank you
once again
Terry Hamston (B24)
You can read how Terry won the
£1400 TV elsewhere in this issue …Ed
Going to Voice
When on earth is
the voice channel going to be sorted?
David Brett
(P93)
Allan Evans replies:
David, apart from suffering from the normal glitches of over- crowded radio
frequencies, the voice channel as a whole is reasonably fine and there is no
recent record of voice related problems. As regards your taxi, I would
suggest that you visit Roman Way and have the wiring and aerial checked. |