Quite
often over the years when asked by the
Editor to reply to a letter from a
subscriber, my answer, no matter how I
word it, has had a tendency to provoke
rather than pacify. I say quite often,
because for some strange reason at the
very sniff of a letter showing signs of
developing into a contentious free for
all, that letter or email always appears
to land on my desk! Now whilst it is a
fact that the letter pages of Call Sign
- with their freedom to debate every
issue under the sun (and with more blood
dripping from the pen the better!) - are
held in great admiration by the cab
trade, I’m not for one moment accusing
our beloved Editor of using me to fan
those flames. God forbid…
Using – or not using
- Metrocabs and Fairways…
However, following one such reply that
appeared in the last issue of Call Sign
in answer to the gentleman owner of a
Metrocab who was aggrieved at having
lucrative work bypassing him in favour
of a TX1, I have had several e-mails and
phone calls, mostly castigating me for
my inference that all Fairways and
Metrocabs are mobile dustbins. That wasn’t
what I was suggesting at all. I was
using one example of an incident
involving one vehicle…
It continually amazes me
how many times I get slated over an
article, which in some cases the accuser
has not even read. One subscriber
actually admitted this to me saying he
heard it from someone whilst waiting on
a rank! To his credit, he did apologise
after I read him my reply. He also
promised in future that he would no
longer act on hearsay, but instead ring
me or any other Board member to first
find out the facts or substance to any
rumours before airing a grievance. I was
pleased to hear that and would encourage
all of you to do the same. My e-mail
address is always at the foot of my
articles, my voicemail extension is 223
and if you’re passing the door, there
is nearly always a chance that someone
may be free to discuss the issue over a
coffee. After all, why give yourself
unnecessary stress listening to crazy
rumours that are invariably circulated
by those with ulterior motives, when you
can hear the true facts direct from a
Board member?
But
back to the response to my reply in the
last Call Sign and to one in particular
from Martin Madden (Y97) whose
letter is printed in this issue.
Firstly
Martin, I have never owned a Metrocab,
in fact my only experience behind the
wheel of one was when I was invited to
the manufacturers and had a test drive,
something I found quite impressive but
well above the price I could afford.
Secondly, whatever vehicle I owned, had
I heard a specific model was being
selected in preference to mine for a
particular purpose, I would honestly not
have objected at all because having been
in sales throughout my whole life, I
fully understand the necessity to
project the best image possible using
the best of what is available. It
appears to me that your emotions are
causing you to miss the point. Of course
the vast majority of Metrocabs are equal
to a TX1 or TXII, in fact I recently
spotted a G reg Fairway in such a
pristine condition that I wondered
whether the owner packed it in cotton
wool every night. The real problem
was this: What chance did I have of
getting the best vehicle for the purpose
required if I was forced to go through
the normal procedure of taking the first
available vehicle in the zone?
It
was for that reason that an account was
introduced stipulating TX1s only, which
frankly is rarely used and when it is,
it’s usually for local journeys.
At
the time of writing this article, I was
also working on this year’s Annual
Report and one of the ideas I had in
mind involved a photo using five new
taxis, same model but different colours.
Again, what chance would I have of
achieving this if I made the jobs open
to all and I had to take the first five
vehicles closest to the office?
There
is an obvious logic in thinking that as
all licensed taxis must meet the fitness
criteria as laid down by the PCO, why
should there be any preference in make,
age or condition? That, in fact, is the
answer I give when replying to tenders
because I know from experience that
great emphasis is made in tenders about
conditions of the vehicles and the
reason why there is requirement to give
a break down on fleet size, age of
vehicles and model, plus I might add, an
indication of the appearance of the
drivers. In some instances, these
details can be the deciding factor on
who wins the contract.
However
Martin, I think you will be pleased to
hear that in view of the concerns made
by
|
yourself
and others, plus the fact that in
recent years we are seeing less and
less vehicles of questionable
condition, it has been agreed to
delete the TX1 attribute from the
Board account.
However,
so far as correcting the problem that
was the concern of most drivers I had
contact me - namely that some
lucrative journey’s are being denied
to Metrocabs and Fairways in
preference to TX1/II - we are working
on this issue with the clients where
this is allegedly occurring.
Unfortunately, it has nothing to do
with attributes. The situation has
occurred either inadvertently or by
intention, whereby a passenger -
possibly commenting on how nice a
particular taxi was - being informed
by the driver that it was possible to
get a similar vehicle simply by
requesting such when making the
booking. Very much the same as when
requesting a non-smoker or a six
seater. Or for that matter, a Metrocab
which appears to be better equipped to
take, for example, electric
wheelchairs.
There
is little we can do other than to
explain the situation to the client
and suggest they have a discreet word
with the personnel in question. We
will also be monitoring the trips and
checking the frequency of usage
against the model of vehicle and
driver.
Private Hire
Accounts…
Whilst on
the subject of attributes, there have
for some time been various subscribers
on Dial-a-Cab who are opposed to
covering work associated with Private
Hire. This is a sensitive issue and
obviously as a Board we endeavour,
where possible, to meet the needs of
our members under the proviso that it’s
within the rules and it doesn’t
jeopardize our commitment to service
and, above all, that it doesn’t
affect the views and welfare of the
majority.
During
the time I was your Sales Executive, I
always worked on the principle of
trying to put work in your direction
without concerning myself too much
with morals and leaving it for you to
decide whether you considered it good
enough to pay the bills. Credit work,
Fixed Prices, Cash, Credit Cards,
Charge Cards, Deliveries, Executive,
Female Taxicard and lastly sharing
work with our competitors both within
and outside of the Licensed Taxi
industry. I always considered it my
obligation to you the members, to bid
for everything…
That
we have reached a stage with the
assistance of computerisation, that
allows our drivers to be selective, is
to a degree indicative of our success
and for that I am pleased with what
little I have contributed to that
success. When I first got my Bill,
kipper seasons had such a lasting
effect on the mind that a pound note
had no morals from whence it came or
from whom, so long as it was earned
honestly.
However,
times have changed as have
circumstances and in our endeavour to
create harmony within our Society, we
have managed to find and activate an
unused attribute – the letter T -
which was previously used for work
that involved drivers having to wear a
shirt and tie. Gawd that brings
back memories and the slating I got
over that one!
Anyway
the ‘T’ attribute will now be used
for those trips associated with
Private Hire and will automatically be
assigned to all of our members, with
the exception of those not wishing to
be offered this work. So those of you
who do not want the ‘T’ attribute,
would you please come to the Driver’s
Reception where there will be forms
available for you to fill in and sign.
On
a personal note, I have no views
either way on the virtues of working
with the Private Hire industry.
Commercially, there is a considerable
sum of money being generated that is
available to our members, whether you
chose to take it is your prerogative.
In fact, if a subscriber were to put a
proposition banning this association
with PH, I would accept that as your
democratic right. But rest assured it
would have no effect on PH continued
existence, as seems to be the
misguided view of some. The moment DaC
drop them, our competitors would grab
them. 20 years ago when they first
started to eat into our business in a
very small way, I told of the dangers
and suggested then and repeatedly
since, of the various ways in which we
as a Society could damage their
credibility. But typically, it was
ignored. Now when they are a major
force to be reckoned with, backed by
moneymen in the city and with the
blessing of the Mayor, there is a
feeling amongst some drivers that
simply disassociating ourselves with
them can ruin PH. If only it were that
simple…
One
question often asked is how or why do
large clients put their Taxi business
to the PH sector? There are numerous
reasons, some being that they are
existing suppliers with a long service
record, they have done the rounds of
the licensed trade and feel in need of
a change, perhaps even the old-boy
network |
in some cases may
have played its part! But in the main,
it is primarily because PH were more
willing to deliver what many of the
large corporates were demanding - a
one-stop shop including Licensed
Taxis. Remember, the licensed trade is
not losing this business, it is simply
reaching us via a third party…
Westminster
TaxiCard and Wheelchair Users
Of the many
subscribers who regularly cover the
Westminster Taxicard account, there
were a number who contacted me
immediately after the start of the new
contract to voice their concerns at
the dropping of the wheelchair
surcharge. I explained that it was not
our idea to do this to be competitive,
it was simply a condition of the
tender and also the fact that from 8
October 2004, the new Handicapped
Persons Discrimination Act deemed it
illegal to make any additional charge
to a handicapped person using a
wheelchair. To those drivers who
also cover the All London TaxiCard
service, please be aware that this
contract has also had the wheelchair
surcharge withdrawn.
As
a matter of interest, those of you
unfamiliar with this new Government
ruling concerning the handicapped
would be well advised to acquaint
yourself with details as it could
affect the manner in which you work.
Remember that ignorance is no defence
should you unknowingly find yourself
committing an offence involving a
handicapped passenger.
Prostate Cancer
Finally, and I know this is a
depressing subject, but if it benefits
just one driver then it has been worth
it. At the time of writing, there have
been numerous articles in the press
discrediting the benefit of having a
PSA blood test for Prostate Cancer,
with the ridiculous claim that a high
reading (above .07) is causing
patients to undergo unnecessary
treatment including surgery that could
leave patients with distressing side
effects such as incontinence and
impotence. I couldn’t believe some
of these articles, which were
tantamount to saying that someone with
a blood pressure reading slightly
above normal would need a triple heart
bypass operation! Not only were these
articles misleading, they were totally
irresponsible because each year in the
UK alone, one in twelve men will be
affected by prostate cancer - which
has the second highest cause of
death in men and increasingly with men
in their 40s and 50s.
The
PSA test is simply a guide. If it’s
normal, then OK, if it isn’t then
further tests will be required before
any treatment is recommended - which
in many instances could simply be a
weeks supply of hormone tablets. It
should be remembered that problems
with the prostate do not always
manifest themselves by regular
symptoms, in fact some men have no
symptoms at all and have only had the
decease discovered through regular
medical checks. In others, the more
common symptoms are problems when
passing water (and I don’t mean when
crossing the Thames), a slow urine
flow, the need to get up often in the
night, blood in the urine etc.
Unfortunately, driving a cab is not
the best job in the world when in
comes to noticing whether there are
problems with your bladder, as the
opportunity to visit the loo is not
always convenient exactly when nature
calls. This problem also discourages
the willingness to follow the healthy
regime of drinking at least a minimum
of two litres of water a day.
Driving
a cab in itself is a stressful
occupation, so what you don’t need
is extra stress concerning your
health. Following my last article on
this subject, I had a couple of
drivers contact me and I’m pleased
to say they followed my advice about
seeing their GP. They had tests and
then spoke to me again about the
results, which being typical males
they were reluctant to ask their
doctors about. It was even more
pleasing to hear their relief when
being told everything was OK.
If
the condition of your cab was suspect,
you would do something about it
immediately. This same attitude should
equally apply to your health. Think
how you would feel if the specialist
told you that if you had come in when
first noticing the problem, they could
have cured you but now it’s too late…
On
that distressing but sincere note, may
I take this opportunity to wish you
all a happy festive season and a
healthy New Year.
Allen Togwell
DaC Marketing
allent@dialacab.co.uk |