Year Fifty for
Dial-a-Cab!
Well, we've made it! This January
issue of Call Sign marks the beginning of
the fiftieth year of trading for Dial-a-Cab.
We may not be the oldest radio
taxi organisation in the world, but few of
the American cab companies who have
contacted me via the 'net to tell me how old
their companies are (having read the
December issue on-line) even have as many as
one hundred drivers - let alone around two
thousand! Of course, that doesn't detract
from those companies such as Bluebird in
Victoria, Canada who have been going since
1928. That is an excellent achievement, but
they, like many others, operate with around
eighty drivers.
I now hear that DaC will be
celebrating with a dinner and ball in June,
which will correspond with another momentous
part of this momentous year - the fiftieth
anniversary to the day of the meeting called
by Bonnie Martyn at the Albany Tavern at the
northern end of Great Portland Street in
1953. At this meeting, 25 licensed taxi
drivers all put around one day's takings
into a hat that was passed around and the
£200 collected formed the basis from which
they could afford to start the Society. I
hope that as many drivers and their partners
as possible will apply for tickets, because
it's going to be one hell of a night!
Going to the AGM
As the current Editor of Call Sign, I have
no choice but to attend the DaC Annual
General Meeting. However, I haven't always
been the Ed but I still used to attend every
year! It's just one day each year, yet so
few bother to attend. I know that drivers
voted by a large majority to have postal
voting and that was their prerogative, but
far more than 100 drivers voted NOT to have
postal voting. So where are they? Nothing
irritates me more than someone who never
attends the AGM coming up to me and
complaining that we shouldn't have postal
voting.
I voted against postal
balloting, but I accepted the majority's
wishes because that is the basis of
democracy. But I keep being told by
subscribers that this is OUR
|
Society, so why aren't these people at the AGM
to take an interest in our business?
Could it be that they want others to look
after it while they continue to go out in
their cabs to earn money? These are probably
from the same ilk as those who worked on those
rare occasions when the trade was fighting for
something and had called a drive-in. Is one
days money that important...?
Democratic Magazine?
In Allen Togwell's article in this
issue (Allen Togwell's Marketing Place), he
writes about a driver who phoned him
complaining that Allen had made some
derogatory comments about DaC drivers. In this
driver's opinion, any problems we have with
clients should be kept private and that Call
Sign should adopt the attitude of the other
circuit's magazines and only publish bland,
totally non-controversial items. The driver
considered that it looked bad in the eyes of
our clients who sometimes read them.
I'd like to know what you think?
Should Call Sign become tame with no letters
column, perhaps a regular article on
maintaining taxi driver's gardens and Board
members always saying the same thing - please
cover the work, but never informing you, the
Society's owners, of what is happening for
fear of it being read by a client? Perhaps we
could publish some out-of-date info from the
British Tourist Board on forthcoming roadworks
at Trafalgar Square etc. If that last remark
sounds rather silly, then you haven't read
some of the other radio mags. Presentation is
first class, but do you want to stare at it or
read it!
If I sound slightly irritated, then it's
probably because I spent a long time making
sure that Call Sign gave a cross-section of
everyone's views - be that Drivers, Board
members or Call Centre staff. Even clients
have been known to want to contribute and far
too many want to go on the mailing list - not
to keep an eye on us - but
|
because they seem to enjoy the freedom
that this magazine has. For that I am
grateful to all my regular contributors, to
the drivers who write in to the Mailshot
page and especially to the BoM who allow
Call Sign to have more editorial freedom
than any other taxi publication.
Following The Chairman!
There have been some issue of
Call Sign that seem to be filled with photos
of Brian Rice and
this issue may well be one of them! The
problem is that the DaC Chairman seemed to
be everywhere! This month he has been on
several different radio stations, he was in
Covent Garden helping to launch the
Westminster eco-mark for clean air, he
showed a Spanish radio circuit
representation around DaC, he was at the
RADAR presentations for those disabled
people who help to make a difference and all
that in addition to a seemingly endless
stream of meetings! Wherever my camera is,
there also happens to be Brian Rice! The
rest of the Board are considering tying him
to a tree next month so as to get more
photos of themselves in the mag!
New Year Issue
My fingers are crossed that this issue
maintains the standard that I hope it
usually attains, however, although I cannot
afford to take off two weeks before
Christmas, apparently the Call Sign printers
can! So I've had ten days fewer than usual
to put this issue together and that is also
the reason why I have put out a constant
stream of irritating messages asking you all
to let me have any items for this issue by
December 12 - up to ten days earlier than I
can usually run to. Let me know when I can
uncross my fingers!
And Finally...
I hope that 2003 brings you everything you'd
like it to bring, especially good health and
a return to good health for those of you who
are currently not as well as you'd like to
be.
To everyone out there, may I wish you all
the happiest of New Years...
Alan Fisher
callsignmag@aol.com
|