Mailshot is your chance to
tell the subscribers of Dial-a-Cab exactly what you think. Complaints, compliments or just
to write about Call Sign. This is YOUR paper within your magazine....
You can also email your letters to: callsignmag@aol.com
TAXI DRIVER OF THE YEAR SHOW AND ALLEN TOGWELL
Anyone who knows Allen Togwell will know that despite his numerous
qualities, his use of tact and diplomacy sometimes leave a lot to be
desired, but even by his own blunt and uncompromising standards I found
his reply to Bill Tyzack and Russell Poluck's letter, particularly
offensive.
Having worked in the past on TDOY, it never ceased to amaze
me how many 'experts' there are those who are only too willing to
criticise the efforts of those who give up their time to promote the trade
as a whole. I have spoken to Allen in the past about this subject and
invited him to put forward some positive ideas or even join the committee
so that the show could benefit from the expertise he keeps on telling us
he has. Unfortunately, unlike Mike Son who did join, Allen decided not to
take up the offer and as his reply shows, it's much easier to make
sweeping condemnations rather than positive suggestions.
In my opinion, Barnes was - in hindsight - a mistake but the
committee were left with few options that year after Wandsworth Council
pulled the rug out from under their feet when they had been preparing to
return to Battersea Park. Always prepared to listen to it's supporters,
the Committee decided that the following year the trade would be given
what they had been asking for, a professionally run show. An exhibition
company was contacted who were only too happy to take on the
event. Following preliminary discussions, a presentation
was arranged at the Grosvenor House Hotel and the trade and no doubt Mr
Togwell were offered what, we assumed they had been waiting for. How many
of the usual exhibitors (manufacturers, radio circuits etc) took up the
offer? Not one. They all complained, including our own Chairman that the
cost was too expensive and they would not be taking part. So there you
have it Allen, you want all the trappings of professionalism, providing
it's done for free by the likes of Bill and Russell and then you slag them
off when it's not to your liking. You can't have it both ways and your
veiled suggestion that the likes of Bill, Russell, Gerry Dunn, Harry Joel,
Martin Noble and others have given up thousands of hours on the various
trade charities with one eye on the Birthday Honours list is particularly
insulting. I look forward to hearing the news that Mr Togwell has decided
to put some positive input into TDOY. Unfortunately it takes a
bit more than the odd weekend Allen, these blokes work their socks off all
year round, every year and they are a credit to all of us.
Paul Jenner (L19)
Allen Togwell replies: Paul, I'm sorry that you should consider my reply
offensive because you are someone who I respect and have always found to
be receptive to other people's opinions even when you disagree with them.
I made a comment about the TDOYS lack of vision and Bill Tyzack, rather
than accept that perhaps someone who has physically supported the TDOYS
for the past 15 years should have the right to voice an opinion, chose
instead to retaliate by suggesting my only contribution to the show was to
complain about the lack of food. I apologise if you took offence, Paul, it
was not my intention, however I was aware that whatever I said and however
I said it, by having the temerity to dare criticise anyone in the field of
charity, I would ignite an angry response. I don't wish to say anything
more that might be construed as offensive, but please accept a little
advice Paul, which your committee might well consider for the future. At
every Exhibition or Trade Show during the past 35 years that I have
participated at, be it in the UK or elsewhere in the World, exhibitors are
regarded as clients and are treated as such. Sadly, this has never been my
experience at the TDOYS.
Be that as it may, my comments were my views and I wrote them regarding my
15 years of representing DaC at the Show and of expecting no financial
gain or public recognition and just defending myself against a derogatory
remark made by a TDOYS committee member. Regrettably, my choice of words
has caused offence to several people, some of whom I have known for many
years and have the utmost respect for. One in particular who I know has
taken my comments out of context, is Harry Joel of the War Disabled
charity. To you Harry, your charity and other charities associated with
the cab trade, please accept my apologies for any offence caused, it was
not my intention.
LETTER TO DAVID LESSMAN (D19) - CHAIRMAN LTFUC
Dear Mr Lessman,
Just a few lines to say a great big thank-you for the wonderful day that
we had on Friday 10th July to Southend. The drivers, police, caterers,
ambulance crew, entertainers, RAC, Peter Pan's staff; everyone was so
helpful and well organised. My driver was number 30 (Phil) from Ponders
End, an extremely nice man and just so kind and helpful. Nobody could have
done more.
Jordan (my son) was so happy and content all day and when we
arrived home my wife asked him if he'd had a good time and he 'signed'
"more" (he has no verbal speech). That speaks for
itself! You really made the day very special for so many
unfortunate children and their families.
Once again, thank you to all the taxi drivers who gave up
their day...
Phillip Frankel
(Part of) Norwood Ravenswood (Unity) East
The report of the London Taxi Drivers Fund for
Underprivileged Children's trip to Southend is elsewhere in this issue. We
should all be proud that the trade's registered charities do so much work
for so little praise. In this instance it's the LTFUC and Call Sign is
happy to be able to get access to a thank-you from one of those that
benefited from the outing. Incidentally, for those not too well up on DaC
history, David Lessman is one of the very few DaC subscribers to be
allowed to pick his own call sign. D19 was the call sign of the late
Jack Taylor who was also a Chairman of the LTFUC. In fact there is a
strong link between DaC and the LTFUC, perhaps one day it will lead to an
article...Ed
CASH CABS AND AN ECONOMIC SLOWDOWN
Well, I don't like to say I told you so, but in a earlier Call Sign I
predicted that work levels wouldn't stay high forever and that not
undertaking cash bookings was a bad move. Now that an economic slowdown is
truly with us and companies are cutting back, it's about time the Board
stopped aiding and abetting the success of the minicab industry and
reconsidered that decision. The Board's answer for the non-acceptance of
cash bookings was that we could be sued for not supplying a cab, but that
reason doesn't seem to deter anyone else. I have just read the latest Call
Sign and in Allen Togwell's column he writes: "...My role since I
have been on your Board has been to try and put money in your pocket by
way of work, any work". Well Allen, bring back cash bookings and then
I will believe you.
I would also like to ask the Board if they have any proof
that increasing lead times to sometimes ridiculous levels, actually
improves coverage because I believe that during busy periods, the reverse
is true. I know that say in the morning peak, coverage is bad in SW6, SW11
etc, but it doesn't help by giving a 20 minute lead time. If you are
offered a job when it first comes out, can you really expect a driver to
sit around for at least
11 minutes earning nothing before starting his meter? We are all
individual businesses within DaC
and it is probably more rewarding to get one off the street, perhaps say
between 8 and 9.30 or only
|
accepting 'straightaway' radio jobs. After all, we were told a few
months after cash bookings were stopped that coverage was better by having
them dispatched as 'straightaway'.
Barry Spear (Y16)
See Keith Cain's Call Centre article in this issue ...Ed
CALL SIGN
Can I thank you for a brilliant publication. After 19 years on
Dial-a-Cab, I'm proud that such an excellent circuit has such an excellent
magazine to accompany it. My only problem is having to wait until my wife
finishes reading it before I can get my hands on it! Keep up the good
work...
Michael Golding (V55)
Sorry Michael, I only agreed to pay you if you said that I was
extraordinarily good looking as well...Ed
PENTAGON SUPAGLASS AND MY BREAK-IN
I was amazed to see my name in the August issue of Call Sign re your
article on Pentagon Supaglass. I'd like to add a few words if I may,
because the product concerned is really excellent, deserves a plug and has
now also been passed by the PCO.
I drive a TX1 (not on DaC) with a red metallic finish and was
distraught when it was recently broken into. The thief smashed the
nearside front window and took a bag with some personal possessions in it,
but no money. However, the thief's breaking of the glass chipped the
paint so badly that both nearside doors had to be re-sprayed. It was an
expensive job, so I had to claim on my insurance and lost my 'No Claims'
bonus as well. In addition, my cab was off the road for a while, which
naturally affected my income.
I had seen Supaglass advertised in car magazines and
discussed the idea with a guy in the body shop who was repairing my cab.
He said it was probably worth doing, so I went to Pentagon's workshop in
Acton and had all the drop windows on the four cab doors Supaglass'd -
there's a new word for the dictionary!
The way I see it, if someone is determined to break in, they
will get in, but most thefts - and certainly mine was - just smash, grab
and quick getaway. If it takes them too long to get in, they will abandon
the raid particularly when it's something like a taxi, which tends not to
offer tremendous pickings. That small incident cost me almost what it
costs to have the Supaglass fitted! It may never happen again; on the
other hand, in the long run the Supaglass may well pay for itself. As you
surmise in the article, perhaps one day cabs may well come fitted with
Supaglass and then the cost will be even less.
From a very satisfied taxi-driving Supaglass customer...
Dave Berman
London
Thanks for the letter Dave. For those interested, the current
Supaglass cost for window treatment is £850. However, Call Sign has
spoken with Mike Maher, Pentagon's Business Development Officer and the
cost for licensed taxis will come down to £425 for a limited time. Your
cab will be at Acton from morning until evening and it is recommended that
you do not work with it until the next day, as the windows should not be
used for 24 hours. If you're interested, then you can find Pentagon at the
Acton Park Estate, W3 and their phone number is 0208 749 9749. Tell them
you read it in Call Sign and to contact Mike Maher if there is any doubt
over the special offer price. You can read more about Supaglass at their
website on www.pentagon-supaglass.com
...Ed
LETTER FROM THE POLICE
Whilst reading my husband's Call Sign August 2001, I was drawn
to the letter from the City of London police re taxi touting (page 24).
I was not surprised when I read the list of charges and
hopefully the authorities will now start to eradicate the offenders. I do
feel that maybe the Mayor should spend more time trying to implement
procedures to finally put a stop to touting, rather than trying to fix the
Licensed Taxi Trade when it is not broken. He states that there are
prejudices within the trade, but to be perfectly honest, who at the Public
Carriage Office would invite one of these offenders to earn his Badge!!!!
I know not everyone in this world is perfect, but I don't
think that there are any Licensed Taxi Drivers dodging the benefits
agency, driving without insurance or causing actual bodily harm - do you?
Mrs Tracey Tennant
(Wife of John Tennant (T01)
THANK YOU, MR RELIABLE...
Dear driver no.******, (deleted for security purposes ...Ed)
I just wanted to say thank you for returning my mobile phone.
I can't tell you how much I appreciate your honesty and generosity in
bringing it back. Thank you again...
Sarah Stewart
Simmons and Simmons
London, EC2
The letter above was sent to John Wells (K68) after he
returned a clients phone that had been left in his taxi. Many years ago,
Call Sign Magazine dubbed John Mr Reliable when he always guaranteed to
turn up if he remembered. Times certainly change! Well done John... Ed
DRIVER'S FORUM: A REPLY TO BRIAN RICE
Having just read your reply to George Wilson's letter (One-way
communication) in the August Call Sign Magazine, it shows just how much
our Friendly Society needs a driver's forum.
At the AGM, drivers were allowed 30 minutes of AOB, which was
filled from start to finish. So drivers had 30 minutes to discuss one
year's worth of important issues! You reply to George Wilson's letter -
and I quote - "I must say you have asked a lot of questions but not
really come up with any answers." Isn't this what he was asking for -
you to answer the questions that he put to you, not for him to answer his
own questions? It seems that he was asking a question, but you chose not
to reply with an answer, but instead, with a question!
You say that Call Sign is a sufficient forum for drivers, but
in your Chairman's Report you ask drivers what they would do if they were
Mayor. Your reply: "I know what I would do although I'm not prepared
to give the answers here as I do not wish to give ideas that could, in my
opinion, be catastrophic for our industry." So, when were we going to
hear your thoughts that would be catastrophic to the Industry? In the next
edition of Call Sign? Maybe the AGM or maybe never!
Never being the likelier option!
Too many things are brought to drivers attention on a need-to-know basis
and not even when the driver asks the right question is he given a decent
reply. You can implement change whenever you feel like it (ie
subscriptions) but drivers have to wait a year for the next AGM. If we had
a forum, the drivers could voice their concerns and opinions and who
knows, even come up with an idea or two that would benefit the Society.
Because, given we are ALL licensed taxi drivers, yourself included, we
should all be pulling in the same direction, should we not?
Tony Lawyer (C51)
Brian Rice responds: I read your letter with some interest Tony, and just
a little dismay as I felt that there was a sarcastic undertone to it. You
ask when the membership are going to hear my thoughts "...that would
be catastrophic to the industry? In the next edition of Call Sign? Maybe
the AGM or maybe never! Never being the likelier option!"
I think that for someone such as yourself who has been a
member of this society for such a short space of time to make a remark
like that, is churlish and offensive. It became rather difficult to treat
your letter with the respect I always give to Call Sign letter writers
regardless of whether I agree with their point of view. I believe any
member that has been here for any length of time will tell you that they
do not always agree with what I have to say, but I always tell them the
truth the way I see it, hence my comments about the Mayor's options.
Surely you must realise that I would not publicly announce my
thoughts, just in case the Mayor's office have not considered theoptions
that I was writing about. Have you worked out
|
what they are yet Tony - tut, tut, I'm getting as bad as you!
Anyway, I take it from your letter that you would like a Forum? You could
have said that in the first place.
LIFE AFTER DEATH?
Reading Steve Shaller's very amusing item on Life After Death
in the August Call Sign
coincided with a similar incident that occurred to me at the beginning of
August. I was in a
garage in Southend-on-Sea filling up, when a guy tapped me on the shoulder
from behind. As I turned around, I recognised him as Dave Venables, an old
friend from my early days in the cab trade on the Eastern section of
ComCab. I was about to ask how he was when he went completely off-colour
and I honestly thought he was about to have a fit or even worse...
Coughing and spluttering and looking really quite ill, he
managed to pull himself together and explained that he had been told I had
passed away some four years previous and seeing me today, he thought I was
a ghost! We chatted briefly as he was in a hurry, but no sooner had he
gotten into his car than he got out, came back to me, pinched my arm and
nodded with approval before driving off rather doggedly.
Even Patrick Swazy can't beat that...!
Ronald S.Colman (J09)
DIGNITY
As Press Officer of the DIGNITY Charity Committee and Mrs Echo
1 (Geoff Fenton), could I please impose on your good offices to insert an
advert in the August edition of Call Sign. This would help me to
publicise the advertised event on the 6th September, which hopefully will
raise much-needed funds for this very worthy cause. I am a great fan of
the magazine and feel I need all the help I can get.
Thank you in anticipation...
Barbara Fenton (Mrs E01)
You can find the ad elsewhere in the issue. Please support it if you can
...Ed
BROADBAND RADIO
I've finally bitten the bullet and gone over to Telewest
BroadBand. I've now had it since February and I can honestly say I could
never ever go back to dial up. There could be some savings to be had for
DaC drivers that want to switch over to Broadband as Telewest do a
referral scheme, which gives the referee a free month's service and the
new applicant half price installation. How about an article from Vince
Chin on BroadBand radio?
Can I also change the subject and mention lastminute.com - I
just thought it was a bit funny that they push 'black cabs' on one page,
but then Burgundy appear when you 'click on'.
Richard Rootes (W12)
Your wish is Vince's command! See his article on BroadBand radio in this
issue. As for lastminute.com I tried it and also got the Burgundy
website. Perhaps the designers of the site are colour blind and
can't tell the difference between black and burgundy ...Ed
THE PCO, TAXI LICENCE COVER NOTES AND INSURANCE COVER
I have recently discovered something of great importance which I feel
should be made public to the London Licensed Taxi Trade. It is that on the
expiry of a London Hackney Carriage Driver's Licence, when you attend at
the Public Carriage Office (or send it by post) to renew it for a further
3 years, they take your money (£103), your two photographs and your
completed green form and then issue you with a piece of paper they call a
'PCO Cover Note'. This document is supposed to be sufficient for you
to continue driving your Taxi for the duration of the period stated on the
'Cover Note' until the PCO send out to you your new Hackney Carriage
Driver's Licence. Sometimes this period is extended for further periods by
the issue of further 'Cover Notes'.
However, to my horror I have now been informed (in writing)
by my insurance company, (Norwich Union), that until I have my new H.C.
Driver's Licence actually in my possession, my insurance cover is
suspended. Therefore, if I drive my Taxi (and carry any passengers) while
I have only a 'PCO Cover Note', not only am I not insured, but neither are
my passengers should I have an accident of any kind! The Norwich Union at
least, do not recognise the 'PCO Cover Note' as having any value
whatsoever - it certainly is not sufficient for me to continue working as
a London Licensed Taxi Driver. I would suggest to your London Licensed
Hackney Carriage Driver readers that if they are also driving on a 'PCO
Cover Note' only, that they should immediately check with their own
insurance company (or fleet insurance company if they rent their cabs) and
seek written confirmation that they are, in fact, still fully insured to
work during the period between the expiry date of their old licence and
the actual receipt of their new one from the Public Carriage Office.
Further, I would draw everyone's attention to the words
printed in the last paragraph at the bottom of the 'PCO Cover Note'
itself, namely: <<< Unlicensed drivers may be committing
cab offences and invalidating their insurance >>> (my
underlining).
If what I am saying (and what Norwich Union have already
said) is not true, then why has the Public Carriage Office seen fit to add
these words at the bottom of their so-called 'Cover Note'? Is this
paragraph for the drivers' benefit - or is it a 'disclaimer' of
responsibility for their own benefit? Ask yourselves: Would any insurance
company pay out on a claim if there was even the smallest excuse which
would invalidate your insurance policy at the time of any accident?
I enclose with this letter a copy of the written confirmation
I have received from Norwich Union to substantiate what I have said above
which the Editors/Publishers of the Taxi Trade Papers can publish together
with this letter of mine, if they wish to do so.
I have been advised and truly believe that the Public
Carriage Office administrative staff have been causing London Licensed
Hackney Carriage Drivers to periodically drive their Taxis without
insurance and therefore unlawfully, and that they have misled the London
Licensed Taxi Trade into erroneously believing that the 'PCO Cover Note'
covers them for both licensing and insurance purposes when it does not. In
fact, Parliament has provided no legislative authority whatsoever for the
Public Carriage Office to lawfully issue such 'Cover Notes' at all.
Name and address withheld
Call Sign rarely publishes unsigned letters but has made an exception in
this case as the driver concerned has made himself known to us and given a
reason why he cannot go public. Below, we publish a response from the
Norwich Union...Ed
LETTER FROM THE NORWICH UNION INSURANCE COMPANY
To whom this may concern: It is the policy of Norwich Union that at the
expiry of a clients Hackney Carriage licence, we will suspend the
insurance cover for the client's business use. This will remain suspended
until a new licence has been obtained by the policyholder.
Simon Wormley
Norwich Union Insurance
I would advise drivers not to panic re the above. Contact your insurance
company for verification on the situation re PCO Cover Notes. While true
that the statutes do not give the PCO authority to give out cover notes
instead of licenses, neither do they forbid them doing so and any
legalities may well depend on interpretations as to what the PCO are
allowed to do off their own bat. Call Sign also invites the PCO to respond
within these pages...Ed
THANK YOU DIAL-A-CAB
Through the offices of Call Sign and on behalf of The London
Taxidrivers' Fund for
Underprivileged Children, I would take the opportunity to thank DaC most
sincerely for the donation of a computer complete with all the trimmings.
The saving this generous offer makes, allows reserves to be directed where
they can be of far more use and also eases the burden of Committee
administration. Very many thanks once again...
David S. Lessman (D19) Hon. Chairman.
|